If anything is well-suited for Jewish power and influence, it is finance. Jews are to the West what the British Imperialists were to India–a small but powerful minority occupying the role of the POWER ELITE. Since a minority elite lacks power-by-numbers, they must rely on the strategy of divide-and-rule. Thus, over the centuries in Europe, Jews served the gentile aristocracy in oppressing the gentile masses, played the role of the ascendant bourgeoisie sidelining the aristocracy, or agitated the masses against the traditional elite. To be sure, Jews weren’t the only ones playing dirty and venal. The mostly corrupt, parasitic, and lazy European aristocratic elites depended on the Jews to collect taxes and to serve as middlemen. When the masses got angry and rose up, the gentile aristocrats conveniently dumped all the blame on the Jew-the-Christ-killer and sat back while the masses vented their anger on the Jews. (Today, Jews similarly channel the rage and frustration of Americans against the Chinese and the Muslims, even though the rise of China is the product of globalism commandeered by Jews and the ‘Muslim Problem’ is the result of Jewish-controlled US policy toward the Middle East.)
Since Jews were not allowed to own much or any land and/or were forced to live in ghettos, finance became important to their power and survival. Financial wealth is portable and could take on many forms. Even a Jew forced to live in a ghetto could gain much wealth through finance and contracts based upon it. Even a Jew without landed property could own paper wealth or relatively portable(or conceal-able)gold. A Jew expelled from one region to another couldn’t take his house or land with him, but he could take his wealth writ on paper. It’s no wonder that Jews became the masters of finance. Though their high intelligence suited them well for this profession, it was historical and social pressures which forced Jews to hone their financial skills further and further. Jews learned how to transform real wealth into paper wealth, how to hide wealth through a myriad of contracts and laws, and transfer wealth from one place to another. There is no doubt that this played a great role in the rise of the West. Non-Western peoples didn’t have comparable Jewish community with as much skill or innovative spirit. Chinese have been called the "Jews of Asia", but the Chinese never developed techniques and systems as intricate and brilliant as those of the Jews.
In a way, finance was to Jewish economics what monotheism was to Jewish spirituality. Throughout the ages, Jews were a talented and smart people without a home of their own. Forced to be nomads going from one place to another, they didn’t have the luxury of attaching their sacredness to a particular place or time. Since Jews were almost permanently in exile, their God had to be abstracted, intellectualized, and made portable. Thus, it could be said that if Greek gods ruled Greece, Egyptian gods ruled over the Egyptian world, and Germanic gods ruled over the Germanic lands, the Jewish God, in contrast, ruled over everything and everyone and was everywhere at all times. This was the great spiritual innovation of the Jews, a first kind of spiritual universalism which would eventually spawn Christianity and Islam.
It is paradoxical but true. The Almighty Jewish God was formulated out of Jewish weakness–their exile and lack of home–, and He became more powerful than all the myriad non-Hebraic gods put together. Jews learned, both spiritually and economically, how to turn disadvantage into an advantage. If you can’t have a permanent home and sanctify it as the sacred ground of your god or gods, then create a god that rules the heavens over all the lands, a kind of god who will always be with you no matter where you are. If you can’t own land or much physical property, find a way to own wealth through financial contracts and middleman professions. Jewish spiritualism was so enticing and profound that it eventually converted much of the pagan world. Today, nearly half the world is Christian or Muslim. And Jewish economic instruments and skills became so awesome that powerful gentiles came to depend on the Jews. Many kings and aristocrats came to rely on Jewish financial backing to expand their empires, build new palaces, and throw lavish parties. In a country like Hungary in the late 19th and early 20th century, the gentile monarchy and aristocracy almost entirely depended on the talented Jewish business and intellectual community to do all the modernizing.
As powerful and influential as the Jews became in the West by the 19th century, it could not be said that they were the power elite overlords of any nation until after WWII. True, Otto von Bismarck depended on Jewish money to wage the wars of German unification. True, finance came to dominate much of the British economy by the early 20th century. True, Winston Churchill had powerful Jewish backers. True, Jews gained a lot of power and influence in the United States of the 40s and 50s. Even so, the gentile power elite to had the final say. The majority of Jews, whatever their ideology or agenda, knew well not to ‘rock the boat’ too much.
Until the end of WWII and the revelations about the Holocaust–and the moral discrediting of the Right–, anti-Jewish sentiments were quite common and popular all over Europe. Respectable newspapers, scholars, intellectuals, and famous people expounded on the dangers of the Jews at great length to large audiences. There was little shame attached to ‘antisemitism’ since it wasn’t associated with any great modern crime. As far as the masses could tell, there were two kinds of prominent Jews: the rich finance capitalist Jews who grew richer while the masses got poorer during the Depression AND the radical leftist Jew who threw bombs & called for bloody revolution, such as the ones in Russia. There was also a third kind of Jews, also disliked by many: the decadent Jew spreading the filth of pornography, obscenity, and cultural degeneracy. It may well be that the majority of Jews were normal middle class people who wanted to get along with majority society; even so, an higher percentage of Jews was ‘subversive’ and ‘radical’ than among other groups. To be sure, this wasn’t necessarily a bad thing as good things can come out of crisis, curiosity, boldness, innovation, and experimentation. Even so, the Depression made many people feel sour, and there was a lot of resentment among the masses and nationalists at the Jews for representing (1) financial exploitation (2) bolshevism (3) cultural decadence. Indeed, there rose a powerful anti-Jewish right even in America during the 1930s. And, there were many on the Left who were also openly critical of Jewish power.
Because Jews were under so much moral pressure, social distrust, and ostracization, many Jews–especially powerful and respectable ones–decided not to make too much trouble and, instead, seek approval from mainstream society and from the gentile elites. Thus, it could be said that no matter how rich and powerful they became, Jews deferred to goy power until relatively recently.
But, we know what happened in WWII. Hitler went totally crazy, laid all of Europe to waste, even attacked an ally in the form of the USSR, and then killed around 4-6 million Jews(even women, children, and old folks). Jews, who had universalized spirituality and finance, found a powerful and clever way to universalize the tragedy of the Holocaust into a secular religion. Initially, Jews flattered and praised white Americans for having defeated the evil Nazi Germans. Thus, American whites thought Holocaust-ism would be great for white American power and moral authority. It would signify and dignify white Americans as having been noble and brave, having possessed the guts and glory to defeat the most evil regime that ever was. White Americans thought that because they defeated Hitler and won WWII, Jews would forever be grateful and deferential to the white gentile American community. Thus, Holocaust-ism or Holocaustianity became a new religion in America.
But, white Americans hadn’t suspected that once they took Holocaustianity to heart, Jews would begin to tear out their hearts, piece by piece. If indeed the Nazis were the greatest evildoers that ever was and if the Holocaust was the greatest crime committed by man–according to the religion of Holocaustianity–, what were the central ideas behind Nazism and the Holocaust? They were ‘Aryan’ Power–a narrow form of white power–, radical racism, Western Imperialism(against Eastern Europe, especially Russia), and antisemitism. It was only a matter of time before Jews began to associate White Americanism–especially the conservative kind–with Nazism and radical racism. After all, hadn’t United States been created by Western Imperialism against the Indians? Genocide? Didn’t white Americans enslave blacks and then deny them equal rights even after Emancipation? Didn’t American immigration policy favor and discriminate against people based on race?
Unbeknownst to dimwit goyim was the danger of Holocaustianity serving as a kind of Trojan Horse against white American power. Whether White America was with or without great sins is another topic for debate. The fact is until the rise of Holocaustianity, White America had balanced universalist principles in the US Constitution with the survivalist needs of White Power. Americans were indeed idealistic and seek gradual progress toward a society fairer to all, but white Americans had no illusions about who should really dominate this country politically and demographically. The capacity for social/historical guilt–moral conscience–was one of the great hallmarks of American society and politics, thus paving the way for a more just society for all–as opposed to the stagnant, greedy, and petty cultures of Latin America or Imperial Russia. However, white Americans were also pragmatic and knew well enough about the dangers of radical idealism. In other words, survival and power came first, progress and reform came second. In other words, don’t push for ‘progress’ or ‘reform’ AT THE EXPENSE OF white power and pride. But, once Holocaustianity became the new secular religion of the land, white Americans began to embrace idealism and social conscience OVER the needs of survival and power. And post-war America–and Europe–were ideal places for this kind of psycho-spiritual transformation. With the economy booming , the future seeming bright, and good times were expected to last forever, the majority of white Americans began feel secure in their power and privilege and thought they could afford to be nice, compassionate, generous, and progressive. Indeed, white Americans tended to be far more conservative and nationalist–if not in economic policy–during the era of FDR than in the Eisenhower 50s and Nixon 60s/70s. During the days of the Great Depressions and World Crisis, most white Americans thought in terms of MY COUNTRY, MY JOB, MY RIGHTS, MY SECURITY. Most whites didn’t vote for FDR for his ‘progressive’ social policies but because they were angry with the Rich who hogged all the wealth and were out-of-touch. The 30s and 40s were, in many ways, a socially conservative period. Indeed, true liberalization of society began in the booming 50s, when white families moved to the suburbs, owned cars, and lived in houses where every child had his own bedroom. It was in such atmosphere of stability, security, and prosperity that white Americans felt they could afford to be far more socially and morally conscientious than they or their forbears had ever been.
And, it was on such an unwitting and earnest populace that the Jews pulled off a great trick with their promotion of Holocaustianity. Holocaustianity said INNOCENT JEWS were murdered by EVIL GERMANS who were defeated by COURAGEOUS AND NOBLE (and mostly white)AMERICANS. It made white Americans feel good about themselves. Even nasty white kids who picked on Jewish kids at school watched war movies and TV shows where patriotic heroes were American soldiers fighting those nasty Nazis. Thus, White America initially felt empowered by Holocaustianity.
But, once Holocaustianity became the national religion, Jews began to undermine the authority of White America itself. Jews said FDR must have been ‘antisemitic’ because he didn’t bomb railway lines transporting Jews to the death camps. Jews never tired of pointing out that the majority of Americans had opposed entry into the European war until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. In other words, Americans fought and defeated Nazi Germany because it was an ally of Japan than because Americans felt any love for the Jews or moral disgust with Nazi ideology. (Of course, Jews in the free world never pleaded with democratic governments do something about Stalin and his radical Jewish henchmen’s mass killing of millions. Indeed, many Jews in the free world aided and abetted Soviet communism though various means. But, we are supposed to forget about this because, well, Jews want us to.) So, the focus on the Holocaust initially made white Americans feel euphoric and proud, as if they’d done so much to save the world from evil, but then it made them feel depressed because the newly ascendant Jews who controlled the media and academia informed a new generation of white Americans that they hadn’t done enough in WWII to save the Jews. And, TV documentaries like LIBERATORS even used historical falsehoods–such as black soldiers liberating Nazi death camps–to argue that white Americans were really no better than Nazis. The documentary suggested Holocaust Jews = Segregated Blacks; Nazi Germans = White Americans. Though LIBERATORS was eventually exposed as a huge fraud, it was soon buried in the news and cultural memory because of liberal Jewish control of the PBS and the mass media. If Jimmy the Greek and Don Imus got fired for their silly or simple-minded remarks, the fraudsters who committed intellectual and historical vandalism with LIBERATORS all got to carry on with their careers.
The rise of Holocaustianity posed a mortal threat to White Americans since America too had been founded on white power, white expansion, and good amount of white oppression of non-whites. Of course, white Americans never committed anything on the scale of the Holocaust–except some episodes of the Civil War–, but liberal Jews persistently argued that there was no fundamental difference between what White Americans did and what Nazi Germans did. A good amount of historical literature by Jews remind us that Hitler’s dream of lebensraum had been modeled partly on White American expansion at the expense of indigenous peoples. Never mind important differences. Most of the American continent was empty, and the natives were primitive and standing in the way of civilizational progress; besides, the natives were pushed into reservations, not exterminated. Hitler, on the other hand, sought to conquer, enslave, and commit mass murder against a great civilization populated with nearly 200 million people. And, we may also point out that Jews are rather silent on the parallel between the Nazi lebensraum and what the Jewish Zionists have done–and are still doing–to the indigenous Palestinian population. Two-faced Jews resort to double-standard. Jews like Daniel Goldhagen give the game away, but as the most of the media is owned and controlled by liberal Jews, we are not allowed to harbor any negative stereotypes of the Jews–even though Jews work overtime to spread ugly and hateful stereotypes of White Americans with any racial pride and consciousness.
Initially, Holocaustianity made White Americans feel SYMPATHY for the poor helpless Jews. After WWII, the image of the Jew held by many–even those who’d been traditionally hostile to Jews–was one of pity, sadness, tragedy, and compassion. The Holocaust was just too horrible. Also, at a time when most graphic images of violence and war were censored in newsreels and movies–fiction and non-fiction–, it was a horrible shock to many to see the raw footage of dead bodies in Nazi death camps. That sort of thing had never really been shown in such manner to the larger public before. Therefore, many people came to believe that there was something especially wicked about Nazi evil. Mountains of corpses had been produced by other regimes at other times and other places, but the imagery of the Holocaust was the first time that sort of thing was shown to the larger public in uncensored form. In the 40s, one could watch a lot of war footage in newsreels and never really see the TRUE face of war. The censors were careful to focus on the heroism, the excitement, the glory, and even the fun of war. Of course, negative propaganda against the enemy was nothing new in war. In WWII, the Allies were told of the ‘Huns’ raping all the women and bayoneting babies. But, most of such propaganda were conveyed through hearsay, rumors, posters, or leaflets. But after WWII, there followed not only an extended WAR CRIMES trial but an avalanche of Holocaust imagery through newsreels and documentaries which exposed people around the world to images they’d hardly seen before–at least in films. Thus, even though much the same happened in Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China, people came to associate only the Holocaust with actual images of countless corpses bulldozed into giant pits.
Anyway, it’s not hard to understand why many White Americans were so sympathetic and pitying toward to the Jewish community. Many American Jews may have been rich, successful, and even many times better off than white Americans, but ALL Jews came to be seen as part of a Great Tragic People. Even millionaire Jews and powerful Jews were seen as part of the helpless victim group. Even communist Jews–though they’d helped Stalin kill millions or aided/abetted communism through espionage or aspirations toward cultural hegemony. In a way, this made White Americans feel both good and confident about themselves. After all, compassion goes from the rich or powerful to the poor or weak. The act of feeling sympathy toward the Jews made White Americans feel richer and more powerful than the Jews. So, even if a Jew were a millionaire and a White American were merely middle class, the latter felt a sense of power and superiority in feeling sorry for the poor poor rich Jew. In other words, even a rich Jew was a poor poor victim, thus helpless and in need of the affection and protection of White Americans. Jews must have been laughing their butts off at the dimwit stupidity of Whites Americans, but that’s how it was.
Eventually, White American compassion for the Jews turned into White American Fear of the Jews–but a fear that could not speak its name and masquerade as pure sympathy. (In a way, white American Fear and Total Devotion to the Jews is very much like the Ancient Jews’ Fear and Total Devotion to Yahweh. To what extent this is devotion fueled by fear, we can’t say. But, just as the ancient Jews were never allowed to criticize Yahweh under any circumstances and always obligated to believe that Yahweh was, is, and shall be all-knowing and all-perfect, today’s white American gentiles are never allowed to criticize Jews under any circumstances and expected to believe that Jews have been, are, and will be perfect for all time. Thus in the Bible, even when Yahweh was at fault, the Jews had to blame themselves for their misfortune and beg forgiveness from Yahweh. Thus today, even when Jews are at fault for much of our problems, we are supposed to blame ourselves for all the failures and beg for approval and advice from the Jewish community. When Jews began to disbelieve in their God, their began to take on the full arrogance of their God. We see this trait in everyone from Karl Marx to Ayn Rand. How else do you explain white conservatives sucking up to Jews even though the Jewish community turned Barack Obama into president and is promoting anti-white miscegenation in movies, music, and schools?)
Initially, it had been a sign of moral goodness and big-heartedness on the part of White Americans to express sympathy toward the Jewish community. But, as Holocaustianity went from a matter of personal faith to a mandated national religion, it became incumbent for all to bow down before the Jew and suckle his toes and kiss his ass. Anne Frank turned into Anne Frankenstein.
Immediately after WWII, a white American got extra points on the moral-social-political score sheet if he expressed warmth and sympathy toward the Jewish community. By the 1960s, one had no choice but to agree and bellow that Jews were the finest people, the greatest people, most tragic people, most wonderful people, etc, etc. Worse, it was even forbidden to criticize wicked leftist and radical Jews. Today, Richard Nixon is reviled most not for Watergate or other nefarious activities but for his private conversations on Jews. Never mind that Nixon wasn’t anti-Jewish and indeed admired the Jewish community. Nixon had only been angry with the leftist/liberal Jewish community, but he’s been tagged as a ‘rabid and virulent antisemite’ because he dared to state the obvious: a lot of Jews are stinking agents of the Left.
With Jewish power rising to new heights in the 60s, with its tentacles reaching into areas of finance, academia, law, media, and much else, Jews no longer needed to plead for sympathy. They could demand respect and mandate sympathy. (Similarly, Christians started out by preaching to pagan non-believers that Jesus was a great man deserving of our sympathy for his sacrifice for mankind, but once they gained power, they FORCED everyone to sympathize with and worship Jesus OR ELSE!! The object of sympathy became the justification for coercion. The same can be said of the cult around Michael King, aka Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who was said to be a decent and humble man worthy of our sympathy. Initially, we had a choice whether to admire him or not. Today, we don’t have a choice. We must all bow down before his image, praise him as the second coming, and dare not mutter dissent from the orthodoxy where he was the greatest American and saint that ever lived. If you speak the truth–that he was a punkass fraud who only used the Trojan Horse trick to fool whitey–, you are denounced and blacklisted just like heretics had once been burned at the stake by Christians. So much for King’s lessons on humility, understanding, and forgiveness. The spirituality of the ‘weak’ morph into the ideology of power–once the champions of the weak take control of society.)
Jews gained the power to make or break the careers of politicians, professors, media personalties, movie stars, entertainers, etc. This state of affairs had resulted in a very serious crisis in America. Jews have simultaneously become the MOST POWERFUL and the MOST PITIED people in America. Because we are still supposed to see the Jews in relation to the Holocaust–through which Jews have gained a kind of PERMANENT NOBILITY no matter what are doing or may do in the future–, we are supposed to see them as forever helpless and in need of our love and protection. Thus, we have so many dimwit gung ho American soldiers willing to fight Zionist wars in order to save wonderful Israelis from those evil Muslims. Thus, we have white goy ‘conservative’ shills–hired and funded by rich Jewish institutions and individuals–encouraging small town white gentile kids to join the army and lose limbs and life fighting for essentially Jewish interests. Since Jews are forever associated with the Holocaust, we see the world through a kind of a Holokeidoscope. So, never mind all the manipulations and transgressions pulled or committed by Zionist Israelis and AIPAC. We are supposed to see a poor helpless little Israel–an oasis of sanity and peace–surrounded by neo-nazi Arab and Muslim nations, all of whom are hatching new plans to blow Israel off the map with nukes(which they don’t have). This silly madness even extends to stuff like ‘gay marriage’. If you oppose it, you must be a Nazi since Nazis not only killed Jews but also gays.
Anyway, back to the importance of finance and hightech to the modern Jewish community. As I’ve said before, finance is crucial to Jewish power since it is not fixed to any time or one place. Finance is the essence of globalism as it is portable wealth that can go from one place to another in no time. Those who control banks, investment firms, and law firms control finance. With lots of money, they buy political power and control politicians like so many nickels and dimes in their pockets. Hightech is crucial to finance because it connects the entire world and speeds up transactions to the point where they cannot be regulated nor scrutinized. Prior to hightech cyber-revolution, the world of finance still faced certain material obstacles as much of it still had to rely on people-to-people and paper-based transactions. Once the world was connected through the internet revolution, gazillions in wealth could pass back and forth in nano-seconds across borders. Entire economies could be built overnight with flush of cash–like Dubai in the 2000s–or entire nations could sink overnight–like Russia and East Asian in the financial crises of the late 90s. And in all this melee, there was one people who were always bound to win since they controlled finance itself and the power/clout that came with it: the finance capitalist Jews. Since Jews devised the world financial system, they found ways to make money when the economy was booming; they found ways to make money when the economy was tanking. They figured out ways of creating bubbles and making money by buying, burst bubbles and making money by selling. And, if all were to fail, they could pressure politicians to bail them out to the tune of 100s of billions of dollars. Though liberal and neocon Jews make some token noise about how the culture of greed on Wall Street, they are not really going to do anything that might undermine or undercut what is essentially Jewish power. Notice that when Bernie Madoff was finally exposed as a fraud, the Jewish controlled media only focused on how JEWS had been his victims. Jews pulled a dirty trick, but the Jew-run media made us feel pity with the Jew. If a Jew spits in your face, you will kiss his ass because you’ve been conditioned that way. Indeed, you will try to explain & understand why he spat on your face and hate yourself if you felt any anger toward the Jew... since such emotions would mean you are an ‘antisemite’. Indeed, the Jew-run media is a kind of Madoff scam itself. It’s peddles a pyramid morality where we are promised that our souls will grow spiritually richer and more beautiful if we invest all our love with the Jews.
Jewish academia have treated the history of communism the same way as the Jewish media have covered the Madoff story. Though Jews had been instrumental in the rise and the horrors of communism, most of the emphasis on communist evil focuses on communism may have done to Jews! So, Stalin’s main crime was not having killed 5 million Ukrainians but having had some Jewish theater director killed or some Jewish doctors sent to the gulag. And, never mind that Stalin was loyally served by most Soviet Jews.
Finance is fluid, and nothing is as fluid and creative as the Jewish mind. If the less intelligent gentiles think with solid blocks of ideas, Jews think mercurially. Their thought process is more liquid-like. If the style of fighting among white gentiles is to stand straight and face the enemy–like a lion or bear–, the style of the Jew is more like a burrowing rat, a slithering snake, or a cunning/supple weasel. It’s like the Marx Brothers vs the stiff Wasps. It’s not that white gentiles are without cunning or deceit as indeed many white gentiles are thugs or scoundrels; they are just no match for the Jews, just like whites are no match for blacks in basketball.
Finance and the so-called ‘international laws’ are also key to Jewish power and globalism–nearly identical in many cases–because both can be manipulated by lawyers, among whom the most talented and clever are the Jews.
Also crucial is the fact that finance and globalism DIVIDES production from consumption and employees from employers. Thus, Jews not only get to play divide-and-rule in terms of demographic diversity–increasing the number of non-whites so as to pit them against white Americans–, but in terms of economic diversity. Traditionally, Americans had been, more or less, economically independent. Americans consumed most of what they produced. American workers worked for firms and factories owned by American entrepreneurs and corporations. The American owner, the American worker, and the American consumer were all part of the same national family. Of course, there was a fair amount of international trade as US couldn’t produce EVERYTHING it needed. Also, exports were crucial to the well-being to the US economy, and so it made sense of Americans to buy and sell around the world. Nevertheless, when it came to things of major importance, Americans built and consumed their own products. So, there was a kind of National Capitalism. There had once been a time when one could say without an hint of irony: the business of America is business. This was not good for Jewish power for there were strong national bonds among the American owners, American workers, and American consumers, most of whom were gentiles. In this state of affairs, Jewish finance capitalists could only SERVE than COMMAND the overall economy.
Thus, it was in the interest of Jews to break up the bond between the American producer and American consumer. By creating a global new order, US companies could set up factories overseas and hire cheap foreign workers. Once this trend started, even companies that wanted to stay in the US and use American workers could no longer afford to do so since they couldn’t compete with firms using much cheaper Mexican, Chinese, or Indian labor. Thus, in order to survive, even patriotic US firms had to locate overseas to remain competitive. And so, the bond between the US manufacturers and US workers–both of them mostly white gentiles–was broken.
And since the US consumer got addicted to cheap foreign-produced goods, he lost any meaningful connection to the American worker. Following WWII, there had been a kind of a brotherly bond between the US manufacturers, workers, and consumers. It had all but eroded by the 90s. Of course, we can’t let US manufacturers and workers entirely off the hook. During the Boom years of the 50s, US auto companies, for instance, offered benefits and packages which simply could not be sustained indefinitely. Also, corrupt and bullying Unions encouraged an increasingly lethargic work force that demanded more and more. We need just to look at the big fat stupid slob named Michael Moore. Moore waxes romantic about the good old days when Detroit Auto workers had good wages, paid vacations, and etc, etc. Did it ever occur to him that one of the reasons why Detroit began to decline was because too many fat lazy slobs like him demanded more and more goodies for less and less work?
Also, if we go by the example of Japan in the late 80s, it’s obvious that a nation doesn’t need cunning Jews for finance capitalism to take over and wreck the entire economy. In Japan, there were no Jews to control the banks or other institutions. In homogeneous Japan, it was entirely a Japanese show. Japan was flush in cash in the 80s and didn’t know what to do with it. So, they wildly speculated in finance and whatever else they could buy. So, the dangers of finance capitalism is universal. Nor can we say that a mercantile economy managed by nationalistic technocrats can save the day and keep things running smoothly. This seemed to have been the case in Japan through much of the post-war period, but it was largely the government connected and dominated banks that made crazy loans that eventually led to economic collapse. Also, Japan’s ‘national family’ style of political economics where even inefficient companies were propped up and subsidized by government-guided banks in the name of national unity and solidarity led to tremendous waste and mis-allocation of resources, fatally delaying the necessary streamlining of the economy via the process of ‘creative destruction’ so vital to capitalism.
It is for this reason that the American model seemed to be the winning in the late 90s. Mary argued that Reagan started the necessary process whereby old and defunct industries would be allowed to fail and lose out to more innovative and efficient competition. Instead of investing in obsolete industries, the emphasis was on the new, and this paid off in the latter part of the 90s with the boom in high-tech, a field in which America was far ahead of the game. Alas, financial tricksterism turned a genuine tech boom into a tech stock boom and bust.
But more dangerously, the new globalism wasn’t just undercutting and destroying defunct industries which really deserved to die but was undercutting new and healthy ones. Even efficient and innovative firms often couldn’t compete unless it sought cheap labor overseas. Thus, it became difficult to build and maintain even LCD TV factories in the US. With the world connected like never before, the outflow of new technology–and jobs created with it–happened lightning fast. In the past, a US firm might come up with a new technology, build factories in the US and hire American workers, and US manufacturing in that field would dominate the world market for a decade or two before other nations began to make cheaper and comparable versions, at which point American firms were innovating and producing the NEXT NEW THING.
This no longer applied in the New World Order. When Japan or US created a new product, the factories would often be set up in places in China, Mexico, or Indonesia than they might ever see the light of day in America. Though there has indeed been a vast increase in the ‘cosmopolitan’ liberal upper middle class as result of globalism, it remains that MOST Americans aren’t in the upper middle class ranks. If anything, the wealth of Middle America has been stagnant or eroding. When the power and wealth go, so go the pride and security.
Prior to the rise of globalism, the American Middle Class pride and security had been linked to American National Capitalism. American Middle Class worked for American companies and made goods and services for American consumers. And, as consumers themselves, they bought goods and services produced by their American neighbors. But, this ‘spiritual’ bond based on a nationalist version of capitalism was gone. As far as Middle America could see, American companies had betrayed them and gone overseas to hire cheap foreign labor. As far as American workers could see, American consumers had betrayed them by purchasing cheaper foreign-made goods. As far as American consumers could see, American workers seem to produce nothing that consumers wanted to buy. What many Americans failed to understand was all these betrayals were self-betrayals as Americans.
We may blame the Mexicans or the Chinese, but who really created the foundations and conditions for this New World Order. It could not have been made possible without the rise of Jewish finance, Jewish political power, Jewish economic theories(on both left and right), Jew-run media, and the Jewish controlled hightech sector.
Of course, Jews are worried about the rising anger among gentile white Americans and thus try to redirect the anger at everyone else but the Jews: Muslims, Chinese, Mexicans. So, even as Jews preach to us about the dangers of ‘racism’ and ‘xenophobia’, Jews allow white Americans blow off steam by harping about the Chinese–or ‘Chicoms’–, Mexican Illegals, and Muslim terrorists. As long as we say nothing bad or negative about Jews, some degree of white rage is tolerated–as therapeutic catharsis. Jews fear that unless some of this pent-up anger is released, it may one day explode like volcano at the Jews. Thus, Jewish Hollywood is remaking RED DAWN with Chinese invading the US. Hollywood has given us many movies with evil terrorist Muslims. And, many people on TV and Radio are allowed to bitch about illegal immigration. What no one can discuss, however, is Jewish power and how it hurts the interests of white Americans.
Since Holocaustianity has become such an integral part of White American consciousness, even white Americans who dislike Jews make their anti-Jewish argument in the form of a pro-Jewish argument. Thus, they don’t say, "rotten liberal Jews made Barack Obama president", but say something like, "wonderful but misguided Jews supported Barack Obama, which is unfortunate since Obama is not good for the Jews. Oh, I pray that Jews come to see the light and realize that Obama is bad for them while we white conservatives are good for them since our loyalty to the Jewish community is 100% unconditional. God bless the Jews, Amen and goo." One may call this the ‘goo-jew complex’.
With the rise of globalism dominated by finance–made all the more powerful by innovation in computers and high-tech–deep divides were created among the white gentile population. For jobs or job security, the American worker could no longer rely on the American employer or businessmen. (With the import of cheap third world labor–much of it illegal from Mexico–, American employers also came to rely more and more on new arrivals than on white Americans. Even in fields such as computers and engineering, many firms sought cheaper and more docile foreign workers than American workers.) So, whom could the American worker–either laid off or facing job insecurity–turn to? The business of America was no longer business in the old patriotic sense.
The American worker couldn’t rely on himself either as most people don’t have the skill or will to go into business themselves. Besides, with the rise of giants like WalMart, it was more difficult than ever to open and run a little business of one’s own. And, most of us don’t own nor farm the land. Without jobs, we turn to the land and produce our own food–and most of us don’t even have such skills. Increasingly anxious Americans could rely on three things: trickle down service economy, borrowing, and government. The second half of Clinton years saw a boom in the dot.com sector and created a sizable techno-global upper class. They had so much money that they spent it like crazy, and it trickled down to people in the service sector. This trend began in earnest during the Reagan era but came to full fruition under Clinton in the late 90s. For a time, it didn’t seem to matter that so many Middle Americans were working as service sector servants. There was so much money trickling down from above that all seemed well. Also, dotcom boom was such that it convinced a lot of Americans that they would all be millionaires if they owned dot.com stocks. Well, we know what happened to the dot.com bubble. To keep the masses happy, the era of Bush Jr. came up with the Housing Bubble created by vast amounts of borrowed money, Wall Street trickery, and leftist egalitarian demands for equal loans to all. For a while, it seemed as if anyone could buy a home with easy loans and no money down; it seemed as if housing values would keep going up, and everyone could just live by flipping houses or borrowing more money with their homes as collateral. Well, we know what happened to that bubble. Now, we are in the Obama era, and guess what bubble we have now? The socialist bubble where we need not worry since the government is going to provide us with free college tuition, free medicine, free this, free that. There will also be the massively government subsidized Green Technology. Where will the money come from to pay for all this? Fancy smarty-pants liberal Jews in Wall Street will come up with ways to borrow more and print more, and for the next 6 or 7 yrs, it will seem like everything is well again, with economic recovery and creation of new jobs. But, it will really have been just another bubble. This is like the story of the Three Little Piggies. Each piggy–Clinton, Bush Jr, and Obama–assure us that his economic house is made of bricks but it’s actually made of straws and will blow away in yet another economic tsunami.
Karl Marx wrote about the problem of ALIENATION: how the industrial worker is alienated from his labor because the goods he produces are owned and sold by the capitalist. But, Marx proved to be wrong. The modern laborer was not necessarily alienated from his work as long as his wages were decent, he could afford goods produced by himself and others, and maintain a mutually beneficial relation with the capitalist. In other words, the worker felt bound and integral to the rest of society through an economics defined by nationality, culture, and shared values. In a National Capitalist environment, both the worker and the capitalist shared one thing in common: they were both Americans and working for America. They both took pride in American wealth, American power, American jobs, American opportunity. Thus, even if an American worker didn’t own what he produced, he knew that other Americans would buy his goods, and he would buy the goods produced by other Americans. And, though the worker worked for the capitalist, there was a sense that the American employer depended on the American worker. In this sense, the fascist economists were right. Marxist analysis had been too materialist. A worker need not resent the power nor the wealth of the capitalist if he felt that his labor was crucial to the capitalist. Thus, the worker would take pride in his work and not feel that his role was expendable. Also, there would be the sense that whether one was rich, middle-class, working-class, or poor, they had all thing in common: love of nation, allegiance to culture, assurance of fundamental freedoms, and provision of basic needs. National capitalism and national socialism are complementary by the virtue of NATIONALISM. Capitalism need not be divisive nor exploitative(nor alienating to the worker) IF the capitalist cares about his country and regards his workers as fellow countrymen. And, socialism need not be parasitic and devitalizing if there is a strong national sense that social programs are to be appreciated and not taken advantage of. The flipside of pride rooted in nationalism is shame. Those failing to live up to national standards of sobriety and responsibility would be stigmatized.
But, we don’t have national capitalism nor national socialism. (By the way, national socialism here is not to be confused with National Socialism, aka Nazism, which went way beyond sane limits of government power.) What we have is global capitalism and welfare socialism–to be followed by global socialism predicated on the notion that evil white folks changed the world’s climate and thus must dole out 100s of billions of dollars to dumbass poor black African countries run by tribal savages. (Isn’t it funny how, even before the ‘climate change’ crisis allegedly struck the planet, the black government and people of Zimbabwe had already destroyed just about EVERYTHING they could get their hands on? Seems to me that the real danger for Africans is not ‘climate change’ but black rule.) Global capitalism allows American capitalists to look upon their nation as just another ‘market’. If some liberals argue that US is nothing more than a PROPOSITIONAL NATION, some libertarians argue that US is nothing more than a PROSTITUTIONAL NATION(and that it’s a good thing too). Nothing matters but the cheapest price and biggest profits.
Of course, these globo-capitalists wrap and hide their naked crassness and greed by traveling and showing interest in foreign cultures, acquiring a taste for exotic foods, and financing or holding summits on pressing socio-global issues of the day–like hunger in Africa. Though such masquerade, the greedy and crass global capitalists make themselves come across as compassionate globo-saints while ‘bitter and resentful’ white American working and middle classes are said to be uncaring, stupid, bigoted, and narrow-minded yahoos who hug their bibles and shotguns. It occurs to the global capitalists that their ‘progressive compassion’ and ‘decency’ have been bought by a brand of cutthroat capitalism which will ship entire factories overseas if it can maximize profits for the owners, CEOs, top shareholders, and investment bankers. Just look at lowlife scum like Bill Gates. How did he make his fortune? Though monopoly capitalism and taking out all competitors using the dirtiest tricks in the book. But once he was swimming in his billions, Gates remade himself as Mr. Conscience of the world. Of course, when he talks of ‘giving back’, he doesn’t mean giving back to white Americans who actually bought his Windows products and made him rich. He means giving billions–made from white Americans–to lazy, moronic, and demented savages in black Africa. Same with Steve Skol of Ebay. Skol the cutthroat global billionaire scolds the rest of us about how we don’t care enough about humanity. Well, maybe WE could afford to care more if we had a couple of billion too made from dotcom shenanigans.
It may well be true that more and more Americans are ‘bitterly clinging to the Bibles and guns’, but why is this so? Isn’t it because global capitalism–plus massive third world immigration–has eroded the power and well-being of the white working and middle class? Now, what is the chance of the ‘progressive rich’ doing away with globalism? No chance of that happening since globalism has become their main bread and butter. There is simply too much money to be made by the global elites all over the world. The rise of the liberal billionaires would not have reached such heights without globalism. The progressive rich want MORE GLOBALISM. More global capitalism and more global socialism. That way, they can make MORE MONEY and assuage their ‘guilt’ by giving MORE MONEY to all the poor sods around the world. But, what does this really do for the white working and middle classes in America?
To be sure, there are many blessings that come with globalism. One could argue that many backward countries did see marked progress thanks to globalism. After all, even a low-paying job in a place like China or Mexico is better than NO job. And, we have had access to cheaper goods which has kept inflation down. With all the printing going on in the Fed, inflation would have shot through the roof if not for cheap goods made in third world nations or services rendered by cheap illegal aliens. And, globalism has created a new kind of ‘global citizen’. More than ever, one can travel and see the world. One can settle and work in places our ancestors never dreamed of. It’s nice to have friends and associates all over the world.
The problem is people with certain talents or skills in certain professions gain a tremendous advantage over everyone else. If you’re a factory worker, you’re simply out of a job if the factory in your town shuts down. A global capitalist may shut down a factor here and build it over there and make MORE MONEY, but a worker cannot simply go to Mexico or China to work for that factory again. Some professions are fluid and mobile, others are solid and rooted. A finance maestro can, via hightech communications, work the entire globe. It doesn’t matter what happens in town A in country B or town C in country D. He can move capital or exchange currency from one place to another, always find another angle to make millions more. Global capitalism greatly advantages some people over others like never before imaginable. If you’re a corporate lawyer or hightech tycoon wizard, you can always adapt your skills to the global marketplace. If you’re a traditional American worker with a sense of nationhood and place, then you can be royally screwed. Just by using the internet, all of us are easily aware of how interconnected the entire world has become. Thus, those who make money off of this interconnectedness are bound to do better and better in the. But, the fact remains that MOST people live in real reality–fixed physical spaces–than in the virtual globo-marketplace.
At any rate, clinging to the Bible and praying won’t do much good for white Americans. Clinging to guns maybe somewhat better since it may be necessary to bring forth a revolution and tear down the essentially liberal Jewish globalist elite that has undermined this nation and our people. Anyway, things are likely go grow more and more dire.
Jews are united than ever before. Over 80% of them voted for Obama. Jews dominate Wall Street–global capitalism–and the hightech sector–the tools of global connectivity. Wall Street Jews have used the hightech tools of Silicon Valley Jews to financially integrate the entire world, and Silicon Valley Jews have been showered with Wall Street investment capital. Nearly all Jews are also united on the issue of Israel. The stuff about Obama being dangerous to Israel is just a charade put on by Jews in order to fool the world that Obama is not Jewish-controlled and to make conservatives feel afraid for the Jews targeted by the closet-Muslim-Obama(ROTFLMAO!!!).
Jews are in the very professions where they are able to unite and coordinate their power. Wall Street, Hightech and computers, media and entertainment, academia, etc. Notice all of these are fluid and rootless enterprises or institutions. Jews may have been nomads throughout the millennia, but they always stuck together–and always sought to divide the goyim so as to practice divide-and-rule(if not divide-and-conquer). One could argue that there is some division between leftist intellectual Jews–in the academia and media–and rich billionaire Wall Street and Silicon Valley Jews, but this isn’t really so. Why? Because even most rich Jews are liberal or leftist. Google is 100% behind the socialist Obama. Hollywood has long been anti-American. Also, most leftist Jews know their funds come from rich Jewish capitalist donors. The Jewish tradition emphasizes both the importance of profits and prophets. Thus, Jewish businessmen take pride in their prowess of making money. But, they also feel that, as Jews, they must give handsomely to moral and social causes. Of course, most of these causes directly or indirectly serve Jewish interests and are thus greedy and self-serving. And despite the likes of Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein, even most leftist Jews believe in ‘Israel’s right to exist’, which is a euphemism for ‘Palestine has no right to exist’. Besides, even the cretinous Chomsky and the pompous Finkelstein argue that Israel and Zionism are puppets of US imperialism when in fact, US is a puppet of AIPAC and Jewish media.
With the fall of old-time communism–which really had pitted many capitalist Jews against communist Jews–and the rise of globalism, the Jewish community is powerfully united. In the post-industrial economy, Jews are united by hightech, media, and finance while white Americans are divided amongst industrialists, workers, and consumers. Also, if Jews are united by a sense of shared victimhood and moral superiority(and narcissism), the white community is divided three ways among proud whites(conservatives), confused or apathetic whites(moderates or independents), and guilt-ridden whites(liberals).
We are indeed living in very dangerous times. It’s no wonder the liberal Jews want us to be glued to celebrity news and stupid TV AND pacified by more welfare socialism. Bread and Circuses. No more well-paying jobs or self-pride for Middle America? Well, don’t worry and be happy, and just watch tabloid news about Tiger Woods and Elin. Laugh like an idiot to American Idol. Watch more sports and go gaga over black athletes. Watch some Will Smith movie, munch on popcorn, and pee in your pants. Or, if you really have some political blood in your veins, indulge in the mindless fantasy revolutions or violence of Matrix, V for Vendetta, Rage Against the Machine, Ted Nugent, Avatar, or other trash.
How is it that so many Latin Americans are apathetic or ‘happy’ though their countries are in such sad state? Because they are all hooked on dumb soap operas about the rich, beautiful, and neurotic on TV. Junk culture is really a form of mind and social control. It makes people prefer fantasy over reality. Just look at all the stupid blacks in American cities addicted to welfare and TV. This may be the future for all of us. Obama, the puppet of the liberal Jews, is tempting us with more goodies and freebies. He says he CARES about us. But, if you take candy from Obama, you’ll lose your soul–just like little children who take candy from strangers often lose their innocence or even their lives. What Obama’s offering you is NOT national socialism but welfare socialism. Bread and Circuses to take your minds off pressing concerns of what’s happening to this country so that the global elites can yet move closer to the so-called NWO, whereby they can play with the entire globe as their pretty little toy.
Since Jews were not allowed to own much or any land and/or were forced to live in ghettos, finance became important to their power and survival. Financial wealth is portable and could take on many forms. Even a Jew forced to live in a ghetto could gain much wealth through finance and contracts based upon it. Even a Jew without landed property could own paper wealth or relatively portable(or conceal-able)gold. A Jew expelled from one region to another couldn’t take his house or land with him, but he could take his wealth writ on paper. It’s no wonder that Jews became the masters of finance. Though their high intelligence suited them well for this profession, it was historical and social pressures which forced Jews to hone their financial skills further and further. Jews learned how to transform real wealth into paper wealth, how to hide wealth through a myriad of contracts and laws, and transfer wealth from one place to another. There is no doubt that this played a great role in the rise of the West. Non-Western peoples didn’t have comparable Jewish community with as much skill or innovative spirit. Chinese have been called the "Jews of Asia", but the Chinese never developed techniques and systems as intricate and brilliant as those of the Jews.
In a way, finance was to Jewish economics what monotheism was to Jewish spirituality. Throughout the ages, Jews were a talented and smart people without a home of their own. Forced to be nomads going from one place to another, they didn’t have the luxury of attaching their sacredness to a particular place or time. Since Jews were almost permanently in exile, their God had to be abstracted, intellectualized, and made portable. Thus, it could be said that if Greek gods ruled Greece, Egyptian gods ruled over the Egyptian world, and Germanic gods ruled over the Germanic lands, the Jewish God, in contrast, ruled over everything and everyone and was everywhere at all times. This was the great spiritual innovation of the Jews, a first kind of spiritual universalism which would eventually spawn Christianity and Islam.
It is paradoxical but true. The Almighty Jewish God was formulated out of Jewish weakness–their exile and lack of home–, and He became more powerful than all the myriad non-Hebraic gods put together. Jews learned, both spiritually and economically, how to turn disadvantage into an advantage. If you can’t have a permanent home and sanctify it as the sacred ground of your god or gods, then create a god that rules the heavens over all the lands, a kind of god who will always be with you no matter where you are. If you can’t own land or much physical property, find a way to own wealth through financial contracts and middleman professions. Jewish spiritualism was so enticing and profound that it eventually converted much of the pagan world. Today, nearly half the world is Christian or Muslim. And Jewish economic instruments and skills became so awesome that powerful gentiles came to depend on the Jews. Many kings and aristocrats came to rely on Jewish financial backing to expand their empires, build new palaces, and throw lavish parties. In a country like Hungary in the late 19th and early 20th century, the gentile monarchy and aristocracy almost entirely depended on the talented Jewish business and intellectual community to do all the modernizing.
As powerful and influential as the Jews became in the West by the 19th century, it could not be said that they were the power elite overlords of any nation until after WWII. True, Otto von Bismarck depended on Jewish money to wage the wars of German unification. True, finance came to dominate much of the British economy by the early 20th century. True, Winston Churchill had powerful Jewish backers. True, Jews gained a lot of power and influence in the United States of the 40s and 50s. Even so, the gentile power elite to had the final say. The majority of Jews, whatever their ideology or agenda, knew well not to ‘rock the boat’ too much.
Until the end of WWII and the revelations about the Holocaust–and the moral discrediting of the Right–, anti-Jewish sentiments were quite common and popular all over Europe. Respectable newspapers, scholars, intellectuals, and famous people expounded on the dangers of the Jews at great length to large audiences. There was little shame attached to ‘antisemitism’ since it wasn’t associated with any great modern crime. As far as the masses could tell, there were two kinds of prominent Jews: the rich finance capitalist Jews who grew richer while the masses got poorer during the Depression AND the radical leftist Jew who threw bombs & called for bloody revolution, such as the ones in Russia. There was also a third kind of Jews, also disliked by many: the decadent Jew spreading the filth of pornography, obscenity, and cultural degeneracy. It may well be that the majority of Jews were normal middle class people who wanted to get along with majority society; even so, an higher percentage of Jews was ‘subversive’ and ‘radical’ than among other groups. To be sure, this wasn’t necessarily a bad thing as good things can come out of crisis, curiosity, boldness, innovation, and experimentation. Even so, the Depression made many people feel sour, and there was a lot of resentment among the masses and nationalists at the Jews for representing (1) financial exploitation (2) bolshevism (3) cultural decadence. Indeed, there rose a powerful anti-Jewish right even in America during the 1930s. And, there were many on the Left who were also openly critical of Jewish power.
Because Jews were under so much moral pressure, social distrust, and ostracization, many Jews–especially powerful and respectable ones–decided not to make too much trouble and, instead, seek approval from mainstream society and from the gentile elites. Thus, it could be said that no matter how rich and powerful they became, Jews deferred to goy power until relatively recently.
But, we know what happened in WWII. Hitler went totally crazy, laid all of Europe to waste, even attacked an ally in the form of the USSR, and then killed around 4-6 million Jews(even women, children, and old folks). Jews, who had universalized spirituality and finance, found a powerful and clever way to universalize the tragedy of the Holocaust into a secular religion. Initially, Jews flattered and praised white Americans for having defeated the evil Nazi Germans. Thus, American whites thought Holocaust-ism would be great for white American power and moral authority. It would signify and dignify white Americans as having been noble and brave, having possessed the guts and glory to defeat the most evil regime that ever was. White Americans thought that because they defeated Hitler and won WWII, Jews would forever be grateful and deferential to the white gentile American community. Thus, Holocaust-ism or Holocaustianity became a new religion in America.
But, white Americans hadn’t suspected that once they took Holocaustianity to heart, Jews would begin to tear out their hearts, piece by piece. If indeed the Nazis were the greatest evildoers that ever was and if the Holocaust was the greatest crime committed by man–according to the religion of Holocaustianity–, what were the central ideas behind Nazism and the Holocaust? They were ‘Aryan’ Power–a narrow form of white power–, radical racism, Western Imperialism(against Eastern Europe, especially Russia), and antisemitism. It was only a matter of time before Jews began to associate White Americanism–especially the conservative kind–with Nazism and radical racism. After all, hadn’t United States been created by Western Imperialism against the Indians? Genocide? Didn’t white Americans enslave blacks and then deny them equal rights even after Emancipation? Didn’t American immigration policy favor and discriminate against people based on race?
Unbeknownst to dimwit goyim was the danger of Holocaustianity serving as a kind of Trojan Horse against white American power. Whether White America was with or without great sins is another topic for debate. The fact is until the rise of Holocaustianity, White America had balanced universalist principles in the US Constitution with the survivalist needs of White Power. Americans were indeed idealistic and seek gradual progress toward a society fairer to all, but white Americans had no illusions about who should really dominate this country politically and demographically. The capacity for social/historical guilt–moral conscience–was one of the great hallmarks of American society and politics, thus paving the way for a more just society for all–as opposed to the stagnant, greedy, and petty cultures of Latin America or Imperial Russia. However, white Americans were also pragmatic and knew well enough about the dangers of radical idealism. In other words, survival and power came first, progress and reform came second. In other words, don’t push for ‘progress’ or ‘reform’ AT THE EXPENSE OF white power and pride. But, once Holocaustianity became the new secular religion of the land, white Americans began to embrace idealism and social conscience OVER the needs of survival and power. And post-war America–and Europe–were ideal places for this kind of psycho-spiritual transformation. With the economy booming , the future seeming bright, and good times were expected to last forever, the majority of white Americans began feel secure in their power and privilege and thought they could afford to be nice, compassionate, generous, and progressive. Indeed, white Americans tended to be far more conservative and nationalist–if not in economic policy–during the era of FDR than in the Eisenhower 50s and Nixon 60s/70s. During the days of the Great Depressions and World Crisis, most white Americans thought in terms of MY COUNTRY, MY JOB, MY RIGHTS, MY SECURITY. Most whites didn’t vote for FDR for his ‘progressive’ social policies but because they were angry with the Rich who hogged all the wealth and were out-of-touch. The 30s and 40s were, in many ways, a socially conservative period. Indeed, true liberalization of society began in the booming 50s, when white families moved to the suburbs, owned cars, and lived in houses where every child had his own bedroom. It was in such atmosphere of stability, security, and prosperity that white Americans felt they could afford to be far more socially and morally conscientious than they or their forbears had ever been.
And, it was on such an unwitting and earnest populace that the Jews pulled off a great trick with their promotion of Holocaustianity. Holocaustianity said INNOCENT JEWS were murdered by EVIL GERMANS who were defeated by COURAGEOUS AND NOBLE (and mostly white)AMERICANS. It made white Americans feel good about themselves. Even nasty white kids who picked on Jewish kids at school watched war movies and TV shows where patriotic heroes were American soldiers fighting those nasty Nazis. Thus, White America initially felt empowered by Holocaustianity.
But, once Holocaustianity became the national religion, Jews began to undermine the authority of White America itself. Jews said FDR must have been ‘antisemitic’ because he didn’t bomb railway lines transporting Jews to the death camps. Jews never tired of pointing out that the majority of Americans had opposed entry into the European war until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. In other words, Americans fought and defeated Nazi Germany because it was an ally of Japan than because Americans felt any love for the Jews or moral disgust with Nazi ideology. (Of course, Jews in the free world never pleaded with democratic governments do something about Stalin and his radical Jewish henchmen’s mass killing of millions. Indeed, many Jews in the free world aided and abetted Soviet communism though various means. But, we are supposed to forget about this because, well, Jews want us to.) So, the focus on the Holocaust initially made white Americans feel euphoric and proud, as if they’d done so much to save the world from evil, but then it made them feel depressed because the newly ascendant Jews who controlled the media and academia informed a new generation of white Americans that they hadn’t done enough in WWII to save the Jews. And, TV documentaries like LIBERATORS even used historical falsehoods–such as black soldiers liberating Nazi death camps–to argue that white Americans were really no better than Nazis. The documentary suggested Holocaust Jews = Segregated Blacks; Nazi Germans = White Americans. Though LIBERATORS was eventually exposed as a huge fraud, it was soon buried in the news and cultural memory because of liberal Jewish control of the PBS and the mass media. If Jimmy the Greek and Don Imus got fired for their silly or simple-minded remarks, the fraudsters who committed intellectual and historical vandalism with LIBERATORS all got to carry on with their careers.
The rise of Holocaustianity posed a mortal threat to White Americans since America too had been founded on white power, white expansion, and good amount of white oppression of non-whites. Of course, white Americans never committed anything on the scale of the Holocaust–except some episodes of the Civil War–, but liberal Jews persistently argued that there was no fundamental difference between what White Americans did and what Nazi Germans did. A good amount of historical literature by Jews remind us that Hitler’s dream of lebensraum had been modeled partly on White American expansion at the expense of indigenous peoples. Never mind important differences. Most of the American continent was empty, and the natives were primitive and standing in the way of civilizational progress; besides, the natives were pushed into reservations, not exterminated. Hitler, on the other hand, sought to conquer, enslave, and commit mass murder against a great civilization populated with nearly 200 million people. And, we may also point out that Jews are rather silent on the parallel between the Nazi lebensraum and what the Jewish Zionists have done–and are still doing–to the indigenous Palestinian population. Two-faced Jews resort to double-standard. Jews like Daniel Goldhagen give the game away, but as the most of the media is owned and controlled by liberal Jews, we are not allowed to harbor any negative stereotypes of the Jews–even though Jews work overtime to spread ugly and hateful stereotypes of White Americans with any racial pride and consciousness.
Initially, Holocaustianity made White Americans feel SYMPATHY for the poor helpless Jews. After WWII, the image of the Jew held by many–even those who’d been traditionally hostile to Jews–was one of pity, sadness, tragedy, and compassion. The Holocaust was just too horrible. Also, at a time when most graphic images of violence and war were censored in newsreels and movies–fiction and non-fiction–, it was a horrible shock to many to see the raw footage of dead bodies in Nazi death camps. That sort of thing had never really been shown in such manner to the larger public before. Therefore, many people came to believe that there was something especially wicked about Nazi evil. Mountains of corpses had been produced by other regimes at other times and other places, but the imagery of the Holocaust was the first time that sort of thing was shown to the larger public in uncensored form. In the 40s, one could watch a lot of war footage in newsreels and never really see the TRUE face of war. The censors were careful to focus on the heroism, the excitement, the glory, and even the fun of war. Of course, negative propaganda against the enemy was nothing new in war. In WWII, the Allies were told of the ‘Huns’ raping all the women and bayoneting babies. But, most of such propaganda were conveyed through hearsay, rumors, posters, or leaflets. But after WWII, there followed not only an extended WAR CRIMES trial but an avalanche of Holocaust imagery through newsreels and documentaries which exposed people around the world to images they’d hardly seen before–at least in films. Thus, even though much the same happened in Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China, people came to associate only the Holocaust with actual images of countless corpses bulldozed into giant pits.
Anyway, it’s not hard to understand why many White Americans were so sympathetic and pitying toward to the Jewish community. Many American Jews may have been rich, successful, and even many times better off than white Americans, but ALL Jews came to be seen as part of a Great Tragic People. Even millionaire Jews and powerful Jews were seen as part of the helpless victim group. Even communist Jews–though they’d helped Stalin kill millions or aided/abetted communism through espionage or aspirations toward cultural hegemony. In a way, this made White Americans feel both good and confident about themselves. After all, compassion goes from the rich or powerful to the poor or weak. The act of feeling sympathy toward the Jews made White Americans feel richer and more powerful than the Jews. So, even if a Jew were a millionaire and a White American were merely middle class, the latter felt a sense of power and superiority in feeling sorry for the poor poor rich Jew. In other words, even a rich Jew was a poor poor victim, thus helpless and in need of the affection and protection of White Americans. Jews must have been laughing their butts off at the dimwit stupidity of Whites Americans, but that’s how it was.
Eventually, White American compassion for the Jews turned into White American Fear of the Jews–but a fear that could not speak its name and masquerade as pure sympathy. (In a way, white American Fear and Total Devotion to the Jews is very much like the Ancient Jews’ Fear and Total Devotion to Yahweh. To what extent this is devotion fueled by fear, we can’t say. But, just as the ancient Jews were never allowed to criticize Yahweh under any circumstances and always obligated to believe that Yahweh was, is, and shall be all-knowing and all-perfect, today’s white American gentiles are never allowed to criticize Jews under any circumstances and expected to believe that Jews have been, are, and will be perfect for all time. Thus in the Bible, even when Yahweh was at fault, the Jews had to blame themselves for their misfortune and beg forgiveness from Yahweh. Thus today, even when Jews are at fault for much of our problems, we are supposed to blame ourselves for all the failures and beg for approval and advice from the Jewish community. When Jews began to disbelieve in their God, their began to take on the full arrogance of their God. We see this trait in everyone from Karl Marx to Ayn Rand. How else do you explain white conservatives sucking up to Jews even though the Jewish community turned Barack Obama into president and is promoting anti-white miscegenation in movies, music, and schools?)
Initially, it had been a sign of moral goodness and big-heartedness on the part of White Americans to express sympathy toward the Jewish community. But, as Holocaustianity went from a matter of personal faith to a mandated national religion, it became incumbent for all to bow down before the Jew and suckle his toes and kiss his ass. Anne Frank turned into Anne Frankenstein.
Immediately after WWII, a white American got extra points on the moral-social-political score sheet if he expressed warmth and sympathy toward the Jewish community. By the 1960s, one had no choice but to agree and bellow that Jews were the finest people, the greatest people, most tragic people, most wonderful people, etc, etc. Worse, it was even forbidden to criticize wicked leftist and radical Jews. Today, Richard Nixon is reviled most not for Watergate or other nefarious activities but for his private conversations on Jews. Never mind that Nixon wasn’t anti-Jewish and indeed admired the Jewish community. Nixon had only been angry with the leftist/liberal Jewish community, but he’s been tagged as a ‘rabid and virulent antisemite’ because he dared to state the obvious: a lot of Jews are stinking agents of the Left.
With Jewish power rising to new heights in the 60s, with its tentacles reaching into areas of finance, academia, law, media, and much else, Jews no longer needed to plead for sympathy. They could demand respect and mandate sympathy. (Similarly, Christians started out by preaching to pagan non-believers that Jesus was a great man deserving of our sympathy for his sacrifice for mankind, but once they gained power, they FORCED everyone to sympathize with and worship Jesus OR ELSE!! The object of sympathy became the justification for coercion. The same can be said of the cult around Michael King, aka Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who was said to be a decent and humble man worthy of our sympathy. Initially, we had a choice whether to admire him or not. Today, we don’t have a choice. We must all bow down before his image, praise him as the second coming, and dare not mutter dissent from the orthodoxy where he was the greatest American and saint that ever lived. If you speak the truth–that he was a punkass fraud who only used the Trojan Horse trick to fool whitey–, you are denounced and blacklisted just like heretics had once been burned at the stake by Christians. So much for King’s lessons on humility, understanding, and forgiveness. The spirituality of the ‘weak’ morph into the ideology of power–once the champions of the weak take control of society.)
Jews gained the power to make or break the careers of politicians, professors, media personalties, movie stars, entertainers, etc. This state of affairs had resulted in a very serious crisis in America. Jews have simultaneously become the MOST POWERFUL and the MOST PITIED people in America. Because we are still supposed to see the Jews in relation to the Holocaust–through which Jews have gained a kind of PERMANENT NOBILITY no matter what are doing or may do in the future–, we are supposed to see them as forever helpless and in need of our love and protection. Thus, we have so many dimwit gung ho American soldiers willing to fight Zionist wars in order to save wonderful Israelis from those evil Muslims. Thus, we have white goy ‘conservative’ shills–hired and funded by rich Jewish institutions and individuals–encouraging small town white gentile kids to join the army and lose limbs and life fighting for essentially Jewish interests. Since Jews are forever associated with the Holocaust, we see the world through a kind of a Holokeidoscope. So, never mind all the manipulations and transgressions pulled or committed by Zionist Israelis and AIPAC. We are supposed to see a poor helpless little Israel–an oasis of sanity and peace–surrounded by neo-nazi Arab and Muslim nations, all of whom are hatching new plans to blow Israel off the map with nukes(which they don’t have). This silly madness even extends to stuff like ‘gay marriage’. If you oppose it, you must be a Nazi since Nazis not only killed Jews but also gays.
Anyway, back to the importance of finance and hightech to the modern Jewish community. As I’ve said before, finance is crucial to Jewish power since it is not fixed to any time or one place. Finance is the essence of globalism as it is portable wealth that can go from one place to another in no time. Those who control banks, investment firms, and law firms control finance. With lots of money, they buy political power and control politicians like so many nickels and dimes in their pockets. Hightech is crucial to finance because it connects the entire world and speeds up transactions to the point where they cannot be regulated nor scrutinized. Prior to hightech cyber-revolution, the world of finance still faced certain material obstacles as much of it still had to rely on people-to-people and paper-based transactions. Once the world was connected through the internet revolution, gazillions in wealth could pass back and forth in nano-seconds across borders. Entire economies could be built overnight with flush of cash–like Dubai in the 2000s–or entire nations could sink overnight–like Russia and East Asian in the financial crises of the late 90s. And in all this melee, there was one people who were always bound to win since they controlled finance itself and the power/clout that came with it: the finance capitalist Jews. Since Jews devised the world financial system, they found ways to make money when the economy was booming; they found ways to make money when the economy was tanking. They figured out ways of creating bubbles and making money by buying, burst bubbles and making money by selling. And, if all were to fail, they could pressure politicians to bail them out to the tune of 100s of billions of dollars. Though liberal and neocon Jews make some token noise about how the culture of greed on Wall Street, they are not really going to do anything that might undermine or undercut what is essentially Jewish power. Notice that when Bernie Madoff was finally exposed as a fraud, the Jewish controlled media only focused on how JEWS had been his victims. Jews pulled a dirty trick, but the Jew-run media made us feel pity with the Jew. If a Jew spits in your face, you will kiss his ass because you’ve been conditioned that way. Indeed, you will try to explain & understand why he spat on your face and hate yourself if you felt any anger toward the Jew... since such emotions would mean you are an ‘antisemite’. Indeed, the Jew-run media is a kind of Madoff scam itself. It’s peddles a pyramid morality where we are promised that our souls will grow spiritually richer and more beautiful if we invest all our love with the Jews.
Jewish academia have treated the history of communism the same way as the Jewish media have covered the Madoff story. Though Jews had been instrumental in the rise and the horrors of communism, most of the emphasis on communist evil focuses on communism may have done to Jews! So, Stalin’s main crime was not having killed 5 million Ukrainians but having had some Jewish theater director killed or some Jewish doctors sent to the gulag. And, never mind that Stalin was loyally served by most Soviet Jews.
Finance is fluid, and nothing is as fluid and creative as the Jewish mind. If the less intelligent gentiles think with solid blocks of ideas, Jews think mercurially. Their thought process is more liquid-like. If the style of fighting among white gentiles is to stand straight and face the enemy–like a lion or bear–, the style of the Jew is more like a burrowing rat, a slithering snake, or a cunning/supple weasel. It’s like the Marx Brothers vs the stiff Wasps. It’s not that white gentiles are without cunning or deceit as indeed many white gentiles are thugs or scoundrels; they are just no match for the Jews, just like whites are no match for blacks in basketball.
Finance and the so-called ‘international laws’ are also key to Jewish power and globalism–nearly identical in many cases–because both can be manipulated by lawyers, among whom the most talented and clever are the Jews.
Also crucial is the fact that finance and globalism DIVIDES production from consumption and employees from employers. Thus, Jews not only get to play divide-and-rule in terms of demographic diversity–increasing the number of non-whites so as to pit them against white Americans–, but in terms of economic diversity. Traditionally, Americans had been, more or less, economically independent. Americans consumed most of what they produced. American workers worked for firms and factories owned by American entrepreneurs and corporations. The American owner, the American worker, and the American consumer were all part of the same national family. Of course, there was a fair amount of international trade as US couldn’t produce EVERYTHING it needed. Also, exports were crucial to the well-being to the US economy, and so it made sense of Americans to buy and sell around the world. Nevertheless, when it came to things of major importance, Americans built and consumed their own products. So, there was a kind of National Capitalism. There had once been a time when one could say without an hint of irony: the business of America is business. This was not good for Jewish power for there were strong national bonds among the American owners, American workers, and American consumers, most of whom were gentiles. In this state of affairs, Jewish finance capitalists could only SERVE than COMMAND the overall economy.
Thus, it was in the interest of Jews to break up the bond between the American producer and American consumer. By creating a global new order, US companies could set up factories overseas and hire cheap foreign workers. Once this trend started, even companies that wanted to stay in the US and use American workers could no longer afford to do so since they couldn’t compete with firms using much cheaper Mexican, Chinese, or Indian labor. Thus, in order to survive, even patriotic US firms had to locate overseas to remain competitive. And so, the bond between the US manufacturers and US workers–both of them mostly white gentiles–was broken.
And since the US consumer got addicted to cheap foreign-produced goods, he lost any meaningful connection to the American worker. Following WWII, there had been a kind of a brotherly bond between the US manufacturers, workers, and consumers. It had all but eroded by the 90s. Of course, we can’t let US manufacturers and workers entirely off the hook. During the Boom years of the 50s, US auto companies, for instance, offered benefits and packages which simply could not be sustained indefinitely. Also, corrupt and bullying Unions encouraged an increasingly lethargic work force that demanded more and more. We need just to look at the big fat stupid slob named Michael Moore. Moore waxes romantic about the good old days when Detroit Auto workers had good wages, paid vacations, and etc, etc. Did it ever occur to him that one of the reasons why Detroit began to decline was because too many fat lazy slobs like him demanded more and more goodies for less and less work?
Also, if we go by the example of Japan in the late 80s, it’s obvious that a nation doesn’t need cunning Jews for finance capitalism to take over and wreck the entire economy. In Japan, there were no Jews to control the banks or other institutions. In homogeneous Japan, it was entirely a Japanese show. Japan was flush in cash in the 80s and didn’t know what to do with it. So, they wildly speculated in finance and whatever else they could buy. So, the dangers of finance capitalism is universal. Nor can we say that a mercantile economy managed by nationalistic technocrats can save the day and keep things running smoothly. This seemed to have been the case in Japan through much of the post-war period, but it was largely the government connected and dominated banks that made crazy loans that eventually led to economic collapse. Also, Japan’s ‘national family’ style of political economics where even inefficient companies were propped up and subsidized by government-guided banks in the name of national unity and solidarity led to tremendous waste and mis-allocation of resources, fatally delaying the necessary streamlining of the economy via the process of ‘creative destruction’ so vital to capitalism.
It is for this reason that the American model seemed to be the winning in the late 90s. Mary argued that Reagan started the necessary process whereby old and defunct industries would be allowed to fail and lose out to more innovative and efficient competition. Instead of investing in obsolete industries, the emphasis was on the new, and this paid off in the latter part of the 90s with the boom in high-tech, a field in which America was far ahead of the game. Alas, financial tricksterism turned a genuine tech boom into a tech stock boom and bust.
But more dangerously, the new globalism wasn’t just undercutting and destroying defunct industries which really deserved to die but was undercutting new and healthy ones. Even efficient and innovative firms often couldn’t compete unless it sought cheap labor overseas. Thus, it became difficult to build and maintain even LCD TV factories in the US. With the world connected like never before, the outflow of new technology–and jobs created with it–happened lightning fast. In the past, a US firm might come up with a new technology, build factories in the US and hire American workers, and US manufacturing in that field would dominate the world market for a decade or two before other nations began to make cheaper and comparable versions, at which point American firms were innovating and producing the NEXT NEW THING.
This no longer applied in the New World Order. When Japan or US created a new product, the factories would often be set up in places in China, Mexico, or Indonesia than they might ever see the light of day in America. Though there has indeed been a vast increase in the ‘cosmopolitan’ liberal upper middle class as result of globalism, it remains that MOST Americans aren’t in the upper middle class ranks. If anything, the wealth of Middle America has been stagnant or eroding. When the power and wealth go, so go the pride and security.
Prior to the rise of globalism, the American Middle Class pride and security had been linked to American National Capitalism. American Middle Class worked for American companies and made goods and services for American consumers. And, as consumers themselves, they bought goods and services produced by their American neighbors. But, this ‘spiritual’ bond based on a nationalist version of capitalism was gone. As far as Middle America could see, American companies had betrayed them and gone overseas to hire cheap foreign labor. As far as American workers could see, American consumers had betrayed them by purchasing cheaper foreign-made goods. As far as American consumers could see, American workers seem to produce nothing that consumers wanted to buy. What many Americans failed to understand was all these betrayals were self-betrayals as Americans.
We may blame the Mexicans or the Chinese, but who really created the foundations and conditions for this New World Order. It could not have been made possible without the rise of Jewish finance, Jewish political power, Jewish economic theories(on both left and right), Jew-run media, and the Jewish controlled hightech sector.
Of course, Jews are worried about the rising anger among gentile white Americans and thus try to redirect the anger at everyone else but the Jews: Muslims, Chinese, Mexicans. So, even as Jews preach to us about the dangers of ‘racism’ and ‘xenophobia’, Jews allow white Americans blow off steam by harping about the Chinese–or ‘Chicoms’–, Mexican Illegals, and Muslim terrorists. As long as we say nothing bad or negative about Jews, some degree of white rage is tolerated–as therapeutic catharsis. Jews fear that unless some of this pent-up anger is released, it may one day explode like volcano at the Jews. Thus, Jewish Hollywood is remaking RED DAWN with Chinese invading the US. Hollywood has given us many movies with evil terrorist Muslims. And, many people on TV and Radio are allowed to bitch about illegal immigration. What no one can discuss, however, is Jewish power and how it hurts the interests of white Americans.
Since Holocaustianity has become such an integral part of White American consciousness, even white Americans who dislike Jews make their anti-Jewish argument in the form of a pro-Jewish argument. Thus, they don’t say, "rotten liberal Jews made Barack Obama president", but say something like, "wonderful but misguided Jews supported Barack Obama, which is unfortunate since Obama is not good for the Jews. Oh, I pray that Jews come to see the light and realize that Obama is bad for them while we white conservatives are good for them since our loyalty to the Jewish community is 100% unconditional. God bless the Jews, Amen and goo." One may call this the ‘goo-jew complex’.
With the rise of globalism dominated by finance–made all the more powerful by innovation in computers and high-tech–deep divides were created among the white gentile population. For jobs or job security, the American worker could no longer rely on the American employer or businessmen. (With the import of cheap third world labor–much of it illegal from Mexico–, American employers also came to rely more and more on new arrivals than on white Americans. Even in fields such as computers and engineering, many firms sought cheaper and more docile foreign workers than American workers.) So, whom could the American worker–either laid off or facing job insecurity–turn to? The business of America was no longer business in the old patriotic sense.
The American worker couldn’t rely on himself either as most people don’t have the skill or will to go into business themselves. Besides, with the rise of giants like WalMart, it was more difficult than ever to open and run a little business of one’s own. And, most of us don’t own nor farm the land. Without jobs, we turn to the land and produce our own food–and most of us don’t even have such skills. Increasingly anxious Americans could rely on three things: trickle down service economy, borrowing, and government. The second half of Clinton years saw a boom in the dot.com sector and created a sizable techno-global upper class. They had so much money that they spent it like crazy, and it trickled down to people in the service sector. This trend began in earnest during the Reagan era but came to full fruition under Clinton in the late 90s. For a time, it didn’t seem to matter that so many Middle Americans were working as service sector servants. There was so much money trickling down from above that all seemed well. Also, dotcom boom was such that it convinced a lot of Americans that they would all be millionaires if they owned dot.com stocks. Well, we know what happened to the dot.com bubble. To keep the masses happy, the era of Bush Jr. came up with the Housing Bubble created by vast amounts of borrowed money, Wall Street trickery, and leftist egalitarian demands for equal loans to all. For a while, it seemed as if anyone could buy a home with easy loans and no money down; it seemed as if housing values would keep going up, and everyone could just live by flipping houses or borrowing more money with their homes as collateral. Well, we know what happened to that bubble. Now, we are in the Obama era, and guess what bubble we have now? The socialist bubble where we need not worry since the government is going to provide us with free college tuition, free medicine, free this, free that. There will also be the massively government subsidized Green Technology. Where will the money come from to pay for all this? Fancy smarty-pants liberal Jews in Wall Street will come up with ways to borrow more and print more, and for the next 6 or 7 yrs, it will seem like everything is well again, with economic recovery and creation of new jobs. But, it will really have been just another bubble. This is like the story of the Three Little Piggies. Each piggy–Clinton, Bush Jr, and Obama–assure us that his economic house is made of bricks but it’s actually made of straws and will blow away in yet another economic tsunami.
Karl Marx wrote about the problem of ALIENATION: how the industrial worker is alienated from his labor because the goods he produces are owned and sold by the capitalist. But, Marx proved to be wrong. The modern laborer was not necessarily alienated from his work as long as his wages were decent, he could afford goods produced by himself and others, and maintain a mutually beneficial relation with the capitalist. In other words, the worker felt bound and integral to the rest of society through an economics defined by nationality, culture, and shared values. In a National Capitalist environment, both the worker and the capitalist shared one thing in common: they were both Americans and working for America. They both took pride in American wealth, American power, American jobs, American opportunity. Thus, even if an American worker didn’t own what he produced, he knew that other Americans would buy his goods, and he would buy the goods produced by other Americans. And, though the worker worked for the capitalist, there was a sense that the American employer depended on the American worker. In this sense, the fascist economists were right. Marxist analysis had been too materialist. A worker need not resent the power nor the wealth of the capitalist if he felt that his labor was crucial to the capitalist. Thus, the worker would take pride in his work and not feel that his role was expendable. Also, there would be the sense that whether one was rich, middle-class, working-class, or poor, they had all thing in common: love of nation, allegiance to culture, assurance of fundamental freedoms, and provision of basic needs. National capitalism and national socialism are complementary by the virtue of NATIONALISM. Capitalism need not be divisive nor exploitative(nor alienating to the worker) IF the capitalist cares about his country and regards his workers as fellow countrymen. And, socialism need not be parasitic and devitalizing if there is a strong national sense that social programs are to be appreciated and not taken advantage of. The flipside of pride rooted in nationalism is shame. Those failing to live up to national standards of sobriety and responsibility would be stigmatized.
But, we don’t have national capitalism nor national socialism. (By the way, national socialism here is not to be confused with National Socialism, aka Nazism, which went way beyond sane limits of government power.) What we have is global capitalism and welfare socialism–to be followed by global socialism predicated on the notion that evil white folks changed the world’s climate and thus must dole out 100s of billions of dollars to dumbass poor black African countries run by tribal savages. (Isn’t it funny how, even before the ‘climate change’ crisis allegedly struck the planet, the black government and people of Zimbabwe had already destroyed just about EVERYTHING they could get their hands on? Seems to me that the real danger for Africans is not ‘climate change’ but black rule.) Global capitalism allows American capitalists to look upon their nation as just another ‘market’. If some liberals argue that US is nothing more than a PROPOSITIONAL NATION, some libertarians argue that US is nothing more than a PROSTITUTIONAL NATION(and that it’s a good thing too). Nothing matters but the cheapest price and biggest profits.
Of course, these globo-capitalists wrap and hide their naked crassness and greed by traveling and showing interest in foreign cultures, acquiring a taste for exotic foods, and financing or holding summits on pressing socio-global issues of the day–like hunger in Africa. Though such masquerade, the greedy and crass global capitalists make themselves come across as compassionate globo-saints while ‘bitter and resentful’ white American working and middle classes are said to be uncaring, stupid, bigoted, and narrow-minded yahoos who hug their bibles and shotguns. It occurs to the global capitalists that their ‘progressive compassion’ and ‘decency’ have been bought by a brand of cutthroat capitalism which will ship entire factories overseas if it can maximize profits for the owners, CEOs, top shareholders, and investment bankers. Just look at lowlife scum like Bill Gates. How did he make his fortune? Though monopoly capitalism and taking out all competitors using the dirtiest tricks in the book. But once he was swimming in his billions, Gates remade himself as Mr. Conscience of the world. Of course, when he talks of ‘giving back’, he doesn’t mean giving back to white Americans who actually bought his Windows products and made him rich. He means giving billions–made from white Americans–to lazy, moronic, and demented savages in black Africa. Same with Steve Skol of Ebay. Skol the cutthroat global billionaire scolds the rest of us about how we don’t care enough about humanity. Well, maybe WE could afford to care more if we had a couple of billion too made from dotcom shenanigans.
It may well be true that more and more Americans are ‘bitterly clinging to the Bibles and guns’, but why is this so? Isn’t it because global capitalism–plus massive third world immigration–has eroded the power and well-being of the white working and middle class? Now, what is the chance of the ‘progressive rich’ doing away with globalism? No chance of that happening since globalism has become their main bread and butter. There is simply too much money to be made by the global elites all over the world. The rise of the liberal billionaires would not have reached such heights without globalism. The progressive rich want MORE GLOBALISM. More global capitalism and more global socialism. That way, they can make MORE MONEY and assuage their ‘guilt’ by giving MORE MONEY to all the poor sods around the world. But, what does this really do for the white working and middle classes in America?
To be sure, there are many blessings that come with globalism. One could argue that many backward countries did see marked progress thanks to globalism. After all, even a low-paying job in a place like China or Mexico is better than NO job. And, we have had access to cheaper goods which has kept inflation down. With all the printing going on in the Fed, inflation would have shot through the roof if not for cheap goods made in third world nations or services rendered by cheap illegal aliens. And, globalism has created a new kind of ‘global citizen’. More than ever, one can travel and see the world. One can settle and work in places our ancestors never dreamed of. It’s nice to have friends and associates all over the world.
The problem is people with certain talents or skills in certain professions gain a tremendous advantage over everyone else. If you’re a factory worker, you’re simply out of a job if the factory in your town shuts down. A global capitalist may shut down a factor here and build it over there and make MORE MONEY, but a worker cannot simply go to Mexico or China to work for that factory again. Some professions are fluid and mobile, others are solid and rooted. A finance maestro can, via hightech communications, work the entire globe. It doesn’t matter what happens in town A in country B or town C in country D. He can move capital or exchange currency from one place to another, always find another angle to make millions more. Global capitalism greatly advantages some people over others like never before imaginable. If you’re a corporate lawyer or hightech tycoon wizard, you can always adapt your skills to the global marketplace. If you’re a traditional American worker with a sense of nationhood and place, then you can be royally screwed. Just by using the internet, all of us are easily aware of how interconnected the entire world has become. Thus, those who make money off of this interconnectedness are bound to do better and better in the. But, the fact remains that MOST people live in real reality–fixed physical spaces–than in the virtual globo-marketplace.
At any rate, clinging to the Bible and praying won’t do much good for white Americans. Clinging to guns maybe somewhat better since it may be necessary to bring forth a revolution and tear down the essentially liberal Jewish globalist elite that has undermined this nation and our people. Anyway, things are likely go grow more and more dire.
Jews are united than ever before. Over 80% of them voted for Obama. Jews dominate Wall Street–global capitalism–and the hightech sector–the tools of global connectivity. Wall Street Jews have used the hightech tools of Silicon Valley Jews to financially integrate the entire world, and Silicon Valley Jews have been showered with Wall Street investment capital. Nearly all Jews are also united on the issue of Israel. The stuff about Obama being dangerous to Israel is just a charade put on by Jews in order to fool the world that Obama is not Jewish-controlled and to make conservatives feel afraid for the Jews targeted by the closet-Muslim-Obama(ROTFLMAO!!!).
Jews are in the very professions where they are able to unite and coordinate their power. Wall Street, Hightech and computers, media and entertainment, academia, etc. Notice all of these are fluid and rootless enterprises or institutions. Jews may have been nomads throughout the millennia, but they always stuck together–and always sought to divide the goyim so as to practice divide-and-rule(if not divide-and-conquer). One could argue that there is some division between leftist intellectual Jews–in the academia and media–and rich billionaire Wall Street and Silicon Valley Jews, but this isn’t really so. Why? Because even most rich Jews are liberal or leftist. Google is 100% behind the socialist Obama. Hollywood has long been anti-American. Also, most leftist Jews know their funds come from rich Jewish capitalist donors. The Jewish tradition emphasizes both the importance of profits and prophets. Thus, Jewish businessmen take pride in their prowess of making money. But, they also feel that, as Jews, they must give handsomely to moral and social causes. Of course, most of these causes directly or indirectly serve Jewish interests and are thus greedy and self-serving. And despite the likes of Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein, even most leftist Jews believe in ‘Israel’s right to exist’, which is a euphemism for ‘Palestine has no right to exist’. Besides, even the cretinous Chomsky and the pompous Finkelstein argue that Israel and Zionism are puppets of US imperialism when in fact, US is a puppet of AIPAC and Jewish media.
With the fall of old-time communism–which really had pitted many capitalist Jews against communist Jews–and the rise of globalism, the Jewish community is powerfully united. In the post-industrial economy, Jews are united by hightech, media, and finance while white Americans are divided amongst industrialists, workers, and consumers. Also, if Jews are united by a sense of shared victimhood and moral superiority(and narcissism), the white community is divided three ways among proud whites(conservatives), confused or apathetic whites(moderates or independents), and guilt-ridden whites(liberals).
We are indeed living in very dangerous times. It’s no wonder the liberal Jews want us to be glued to celebrity news and stupid TV AND pacified by more welfare socialism. Bread and Circuses. No more well-paying jobs or self-pride for Middle America? Well, don’t worry and be happy, and just watch tabloid news about Tiger Woods and Elin. Laugh like an idiot to American Idol. Watch more sports and go gaga over black athletes. Watch some Will Smith movie, munch on popcorn, and pee in your pants. Or, if you really have some political blood in your veins, indulge in the mindless fantasy revolutions or violence of Matrix, V for Vendetta, Rage Against the Machine, Ted Nugent, Avatar, or other trash.
How is it that so many Latin Americans are apathetic or ‘happy’ though their countries are in such sad state? Because they are all hooked on dumb soap operas about the rich, beautiful, and neurotic on TV. Junk culture is really a form of mind and social control. It makes people prefer fantasy over reality. Just look at all the stupid blacks in American cities addicted to welfare and TV. This may be the future for all of us. Obama, the puppet of the liberal Jews, is tempting us with more goodies and freebies. He says he CARES about us. But, if you take candy from Obama, you’ll lose your soul–just like little children who take candy from strangers often lose their innocence or even their lives. What Obama’s offering you is NOT national socialism but welfare socialism. Bread and Circuses to take your minds off pressing concerns of what’s happening to this country so that the global elites can yet move closer to the so-called NWO, whereby they can play with the entire globe as their pretty little toy.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment