The Hidden Liberal Elite Motive behind Affirmative Action

Many reasons are put forth for affirmative action policies, but there’s one that is almost never discussed. Affirmative Action, especially at top ranked schools, is a means by which the liberal Jewish elites seek to gain control of the intellectual, economic, cultural, and political leaderships of the two main minority communities–blacks and Hispanics. Since both groups are very large and tend to be mired in poverty–especially blacks and non-white Hispanics–, they are bound to be a source of much social tensions and problems. The rich and powerful Jews don’t want to be called out, scapegoated, and attacked by blacks and Hispanics. They’d rather mold blacks and Hispanics to direct their anger against white gentiles.
　
Every community has a head and body. The head comprises the most intelligent, industrious, ambitious, shrewd, clever, and ruthless members of the community. Generally, most people–the body–don’t think and don’t even want to think. They want to be led, to be told what to think, how to feel, and what to do. The leaders of any community are its top businessmen, politicians, artists, entertainers, intellectuals, and spiritual leaders. Generally, the cream of the crop of any ethnic community go to the best schools and achieve the greatest successes in life.
The problem is even the smartest blacks and non-white Hispanics generally aren’t qualified to be admitted to the best schools where Jews dominate as both faculty and student body. This means that powerful Jews in the academia cannot gain direct contact with the future leaders of the black and Hispanic community.
For that reason, liberal Jews favor affirmative action so that the best of the blacks and non-white Hispanics can attend schools like Princeton, Harvard, and Yale. Liberal Jewish professors and students can then ‘work on’ these future elites of the black and Hispanic community. Jews will teach them that evil white oppression–‘racism’–is the main problem in history and society. Jews will teach Hispanics and blacks that Jews are their natural allies against evil ‘racist’ and ‘xenophobic’ whites. Jewish professors will lecture on white evil. And even non-Jewish white professors will teach blacks and Hispanics the same thing since most of them are intellectual toys or puppets of radical left-wing Jews. This way, liberal Jews achieve two things. They make themselves the patrons and ‘friends’ of the elites of the black and brown community, and black/brown anger, resentment, and hatred are diverted toward non-Jewish whites.
　
Just look at Barack and Michelle Obama. Could Jews at Princeton, Columbia, Harvard, and University of Chicago been able to contact and work on those two IF it weren’t for affirmative action? No, there are smart blacks, but even most smart blacks are not smart enough to make it Ivy League schools on intellectual merit alone. They need the aid of racial preference. Jews don’t want to live in close proximity with masses of poor blacks and Hispanics, but they want to gain access to the prospective elites of both communities. And, Jews want to get started with the best of black and brown minds from a young age. Jews want to mold and shape the minds of blacks and browns. Jews figure that if they control the heads of blacks and browns, they will also control the bodies–the masses. After all, blacks ideologically and politically follow their leaders. Until Obama, Jews had a difficult time controlling black politics since most of the leaders were not products of Ivy League but of street politics. But, Jews gained access to Obama because Obama got into Columbia and Harvard through affirmative action. And though he was an intellectual lightweight, Obama was given a job at University of Chicago law school because of Jewish connections. Obama got admitted to schools and got hired on the basis of affirmative action. Jews support affirmative action because it gives them direct access to the future stars of the black and brown communities.
　
During the peak of Ottoman power, the Turks scrounged through Greece to pick out the brightest, strongest, and most promising Greek boys. They were brought to Turkey, converted to Islam, and raised as Janissaries–military men committed to the defense and expansion of Ottoman power. Though Jews can’t go that far, they too hope to pick the best of the black and brown community and mold them into agents of Jewish power. Of course, Jews don’t spell this out or spill the beans. How could they? Rather, Jews speak of ‘diversity’, ‘equal opportunity’, and ‘progress’. And blacks and browns who graduate from Ivy League schools may sincerely believe they are studying and working to serve their own communities–and that Jews favored and helped them out of good will.
But, to the extent that they are turned anti-white and converted into political allies of the Jews, the result is very much something orchestrated by the Jews. Consider that 30-40% of Hispanics have been conservative. Yet, something like 95% of the Hispanic leadership in politics is Democratic. Why would this be? Shouldn’t the leadership be at least 30% conservative or pro-GOP? It’s because the academia and media work on cream of the crop of the Hispanic community. It doesn’t matter what the brown masses believe. The fact is Jews gain direct access to and work on the prospective elites or the heads of the Hispanic masses. Control the head, the body will follow.
Besides, affirmative action isn’t about helping poor browns or blacks. It generally favors rich or upper middle class blacks or browns over poor and working class whites. So, affirmative action isn’t really about so-called ‘social justice’ or helping the poor. No, it’s about Jewish elites gaining direct access to the most privileged elements of the black and brown communities. Jews want to control and shape the minds of people like Michael Dyson, Cornel West, and Henry Louis Gates so that these guys will, in turn, control the minds of the rest of the black community. And, the message is overwhelmingly anti-white.
　
But, we can see the effect of this on the GOP as well. We know that the GOP is controlled by Jewish neocons. Jews figure that as long as they control and buy & sell the gentile elites of the GOP, the conservative masses will just follow like sheep. And the conservative masses did indeed follow lockstep behind Bush into the war in Iraq and all the other policies of ‘compassionate conservatism’ which were really big government liberalism favored by the likes of David Frum. The conservative masses finally woke up and challenged the GOP elite when Bush and McCain tried to push amnesty, but much of the damage has been done.
Even today, the GOP is essentially controlled by Neocon Jews. It doesn’t matter what WE want since the likes of Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin will do as their neocon masters tell them to.
　
Anyway, this is one more reason to oppose affirmative action. It is a Jewish ploy to gain access to the cream of the crop of blacks and browns and turn them against whites. And since privileged blacks and browns, through the aid of rich powerful liberal Jews, gain great wealth and power by stepping over poor and working class whites, the lessons that they learn is "stick with the Jews against the whites and reap great rewards!!"

--P.V.

There used to the notion of the 'uppity nigger'. An uppy was a black guy who 'didn't know his place'. At worst, he acted like he wanted to push everyone around. Many whites disliked the uppy. They felt threatened and/or offended that a black person would strive to be the equal of white folks. But, some white people embraced the uppy ideal. Some white folks felt that the oppressed blacks had a right to stand up and challenge white authority or status quo. After all, what was wrong with demanding equality? Why should blacks have to sit in the back of the bus? (This attitude was telling when Hillary, as the trailing candidate during the Democratic Primaries, suggested that Obama be her running mate. It was like telling Obama,'get to the back of the bus'.) Some whites supported uppitiness out of guilt. This got problematic when uppitiness went from demand-for-equality to expression-of-superiority. Muhammad ali was not saying, 'I'm the equal of you'; he meant, 'I'm better than you slow white boys'. Of course, being a megalomanicac, Ali's black consciousness soon lost its meaning as he trashed his black opponents just as mercilessly(it soon turned into I am better than all you 'niggers'). More important than black glory was 'my glory' for Ali. In a way, this is why black community is so messed up. For all the talk of black unity and brotherhood/sisterhood, most blacks only think in terms of self-centered uppitiness. The putrid show 'Flavor of Love' perfectly embodies this retarded mentality. And, every street thug in the inner-city is killing other street thugs--mostly black--in the name of 'I'm the greatest'. This isn't individualism that acknowledges and respects other individuals but tribal- individualism which sees other individuals as enemies to conquer or destroy.

Anyway, if some whites tolerated or even accept black uppitiness either out of sense of justice or guilt, some embraced--and hoped to emulate--it out of admiration and worship. With the rise of Muhammad Ali, other black athletes, and rising black dominance in pop music, many whites began to loathe themselves as slow, dull, lame, bland, white-bread, and boring turds. To be REAL and TRUE, they felt a need to become 'white negroes'. Some hoped that by hanging around and imitating blacks, they could/would be just as badass by social osmosis. But, whites soon realized that, no matter how much they imitated blacks, they can never equal blacks in the arena of physical and sexual prowess, charisma, and badassness(similarly, a woman imitating a man cannot whup a man in a boxing ring); so, the only thing whites could hope for was to bow down before the black man or woman. Blacks were seen as the alpha race, whites as the beta race. As for (non-black)Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, etc, they were seen as lower forms of humanity when it came to being badass, hip, and cool. Though the liberal dominated media/academia officially upholds the idea of equality/diversity, some groups are prized more than others. Racial favoritism and the Imperialism of Guilt(pushing white guilt to all of humanity) are big agendas of the Left; in other words, we expect Hindus and Chinese to feel guilty of what happened to blacks and Jews, but we don't demand that blacks and jews feel guilty for the Hindu or Chinese historical suffering; since white people--at least Germans and Anglo-Americans-- feel guilt toward jews or blacks, the ENTIRE world must share in this guilt.

During a time when blacks were seen as inferior, whites were faced with uppity blacks who wanted equality. Once blacks got equality, uppitiness turned into expression of superiority. Once blacks gained the alpha race status and were seen as the superior race, uppitiness no longer became an issue. In the areas that matter most to americans--sports, sex, entertainment, charisma, etc--blacks totally whupped the whites. Also, uppitiness was upheld by the new liberal media/academia as a model to follow than as a problem to confront. So, we should all try to be uppity in the black manner-- especially against heterosexual gentile white males(hegewhales). So, women should be uppity against hegewhales. And, illegal Mexicans ought to be uppity against hegewhales--like during the illegal immigrant pride marches last year. Imagine that, people who shouldn't even be in this country acting uppity and thumbing their noses at legal citizens of America. Uppitiness against hegewhales has become such a cool, hip attitude that legal citizens in the US hid in their homes--afraid of being called 'racist'--while illegals flagrantly violated american laws. Blacks weren't exactly happy, as they resented the flood of illegal Hispanic immigration; on the other hand, black political culture is defined so much by mass marches and giving White Society the middle finger that many blacks didn't oppose the illegal march either. After all, it was stamped with the black uppity style of politics.

Anyway, there is one problem with uppitiness. Blacks have become so established in the national psyche as the superior alpha race that uppitiness is no longer an issue. Never mind Ali, who looks downright gentle today. In the 80s and 90s, we've had mean Mike Tyson mauling everyone and threatening murder. We've had Rap Music which delivered a KO to what had once been a white-dominated rock industry. Since the late 80s to now, hip hop has been the Mainstream. And, look at all the most popular sports. They are dominated by blacks. Baseball is seeing more Hispanics but they are mostly Hispanic blacks than Hispanic whites and certainly not Hispanic of Indian origin.

So, uppityness is passe. If anything, the uncle toms of today are white. We have white toms everywhere. Whites are no longer trying to keep the black man down. Whites are not even trying to maintain the idea of equality--except in some conservative quarters. (But, even conservatives have accepted some notion of black superiority. So, if Thomas Sowell or Shelby Steele says something, it's received as the wisdom of the ages. Or, Clarence Thomas is discussed in sanctimonious terms that defy rational analysis. And, even cons, who used to rationally dissect the myth of Martin Luther King, are falling all over themselves honoring the Great Man. In truth, King was for Affirmative Action, generally leaned toward socialism, rubbed shoulders with communists all his life, and chose pacifism ONLY as a tactic than as the Golden Rule. Were he alive today, he'd surely be with the Jesse jackson, Al Sharpton, and the like.)

For the most part, white people have accepted that blacks are superior because the latter are stronger, sexier, funkier, funnier, and more charismatic. So, whites are now willing to follow and look up to blacks. But, there's a problem. Most blacks are idiots and difficult to take seriously. Of course, not all whites agree. There are plenty of white kids who would vote for Kanye West or Snoop Dogg for president. But, many other whites, while acknowledging black superiority, want some dignity associated with black superiority. In other words, their unspoken message to blacks is, "look, I accept that you are superior. I will kiss your ass, suckle your toes, and even suck your d___. Just dont whup or humiliate me and act with a little class." When Jack Johnson whupped Jim Jeffries, he took his time to hurt and humiliate the white boy. This is what many whites fear. They are willing to accept defeat and inferiority; they just hope that the triumphant black man will not mock and humiliate them so much. In other words,"you can knock me out but please don't taunt me"--like Johnson did with Jeffries. Or, "you can take my wife but just don't beat me up to take her from me". Or "you can marry my daughter but just don't beat her up'. Indeed, white girls have this problem too--call it the OJ syndrome. On the one hand, many white women are attracted to black men but soon find out that black men are not loyal nor trustworthy. Black men take pride in hopping from one bed to another, more enamoured of their sexual mastery and prowess than with well-being of their partners--just like Ali ultimately loved himself more than his family or black people. Black men piss off black women by going with white women; but, they soon piss off white women by going with other white women. White women think, "this black guy will stick with me because he's grateful that he's getting white p___y." That may have been the case several decades ago. But, today, countless white women are putting out to black men, so there's no guarantee that black men will stay true to any single white woman.

So, many white people want some kind of guarantee. They are willing to say, "Mr. Black Man, you are superior to us. But as we honor and bow down before you, please go easy on us. Don't laugh at our 'faggoty-ass' bland whitness. If we suck your d___, please don't d___slap us. Don't be like Al Sharpton. Be nice." And, so we have Obama. No one sees Obama as an 'uppity nigger' because blacks have long proven not only their equality but supeirority. So, now the main issue is how blacks, as the superior race, treats us. It's about HOW they look DOWN on us. We are confronted with downity 'crazy niggers' like Farrakhan, Sharpton, and Jeremiah Wright. Or, we have downity buppies like Obama who act with ersatz grace, style, and even refinement.

In the Old South, blacks were afeared of mean, trashy rednecks who had power over them with the whip. Blacks much preferred the refined southern gentleman who, though in the superior social position, treated blacks with some patronizing civility and kindness. Remember the TV series ROOTS? Father Brady(of The Brady Bunch)played a relatively enlightened southern gentleman, and blacks generally liked him much more than they liked thuggish redneck goons.

Today, the whole relationship has been turned upside down. Obama now plays the role of the genteel southern aristocrat who won't whip the white slaves too much. Jeremiah Wright WHIPS the white boys with guilt- lashings. But, obama handles the whip in a much more elegant and forgiving manner. He twacks us gently and then rubs some ointment on us. And, there is Oprah who has mastered this art and made a mega-fortune from off it as the billionaire-mammy-who-inherited-the-master's-mansion. Her message is "as long as you fatten my purse and kiss my ass, I will not take revenge on you honkeys but smile at you with soulful forgiving eyes. Just keep the dough coming." And whites have fallen for this swindle.

Of course, the racial dynamic is screwy because even as blacks have attained alpha race status, there is the massive problem of poor blacks. In the popular arena--sports, entertainment, politics, etc-- blacks are very prominent. But, in many professions and institutions, many blacks still lag behind. Also, the liberal-dominated media and academia never let us forget slavery(and the Holocaust, even though they've done everything to make us forget the mass crimes of communism which killed 100 million in the 20th century).