There are several reasons why Obama has won over many Americans, but I shall consider two. There are two kinds of Obama supporters. There is the genuinely duped, the kind of people who really look at him as the messiah of CHANGE and HOPE for whatever pitiful reason–ignorance, sappiness, guilt, fear, anxiety, etc. But, there is also the duplicitous, the kind of people who know exactly who and what Obama is and feel that they know the Grand Game Plan. It is the combination of images of radiance(for the duped) and of radicalism(for the duplicitous) that has fueled Obama to power. Unless one understands this duality, one cannot grasp the essence of the Obama phenomenon.
We have seen countless images of swooning crowds at the feet of Obama. He is their Jesus, their Leader, their Lord, their Prophet. He might even be their Will Smith or Oprah. Many of these people tend not be well-informed nor too bright. Many of them are young, which means they are impressionable and prone to social and cultural pressure. (Though young are said to be rebellious, most happen to be slavish to peer pressure; even oddballs who take pride in their deviation from The Norm are acutely aware of their social exile, and as such, even their rebellion is a form of emotional slavishness. They need to prove themselves out of a sense of inadequacy.) Many of these people surely heard of reports of Obama’s sleazy Chicago politics or his many lies. But, they are essentially emotional people who respond to images and sounds than think rationally about issues. Once they’ve latched onto Obama, he’s their ‘rock star’ hero; and, whenever in doubt, they go into the ‘say it aint so, Joe’ mode. They WANT to believe that Obama is the savior. This desire is so powerful that evidence to the contrary doesn’t make much impact. The ONLY way they can be woken out of their doldrums is if the media finally do their job and go after Obama for all his lies and expose and shame him. Only if the authority higher than Obama–the liberal Jewish-run media–says he’s no good will the sheeple who worship him finally come to realize he’s a false god. Many of these people are good people, fine people. They are like the dupes in "MEET JOHN DOE". They so desperately want to believe in hope and change and a bright future where everyone gets along–especially whites and blacks–that they don’t want to know the truth about Obama. It would break their hearts and force them to think and use their brains–something they are not equipped to do. As they happen to be intellectually limited, they would rather believe in mantras and symbols. Whenever they hear bad things about Obama, they pray,‘say it aint so, O’. ONLY IF the media seriously go after Obama and expose him in a serious way will the minds of these people change. Remember that in "MEET JOHN DOE", the rich and powerful had to unite and expose Doe as a ‘fake’ before the minds of people finally changed. Obama supporters are just like that.
This of course raises a question. How can so many people be so stupid? Well, they just are. Why do so many Americans prefer stupid TV shows and movies to serious literature and art cinema? And, this is a problem in both camps. Remember that conservatives went with the mediocre George W. Bush because he promoted himself as a pious man of God and a ‘regular guy’–though he was born with a silver spoon his mouth. Many people are dumb.
But you may ask, ‘but, how come so many intelligent and well-educated people also support Obama?’ Why did 50% of upper middle class people vote for Obama? Why did the majority of very rich people support Obama? Why was Obama’s support so overwhelming among the Ivory Tower crowd in the academia.
There are many reasons for this, and let me run them down as fast as possible. (1) Higher education these days means higher indoctrination where thinking CORRECTLY counts for more than thinking FREELY. (2) People with most education tend to come from the privileged class, which means they have had little contact with REAL reality, and as such, are prone to be more naively idealistic. (3) The rich, at least white gentile kind, tend to feel a degree of guilt and ‘social obligation’ since this country was founded upon Christian ethos which says ‘greed is evil’. So, one could argue that even intelligent and well-educated people can be duped or can dupe themselves. They are human after all.
But, there’s another reason why well-educated people–often in influential or powerful positions–support Obama. It’s not so much that they are duped but that they are duplicitous. Conservatives sometimes wonder why so many well-educated and intelligent people aren’t troubled by the fact that Obama is of the Saul Alinsky school. Anyone who has paid attention to the news knows that Obama’s intellectual influences and political associations are pretty radical. We know that Alinsky-ism isn’t open and honest but subversive, cunning, and deceitful. It is the strategy of shrewd and devious ‘progressives’ manipulating the gullibility and stupidity of Middle Americans. Alinsky deviated from other radicals and came to the conclusion that Middle Americans had to serve as the clay for revolution. America didn’t have masses of poor, and the classic working class was shrinking. So, no great social change could be achieved without the support or involvement of the vast Middle Class. Alinsky-ism was about playing to Middle Class anxieties, fears, doubts, guilt, naivete, and hope. This didn’t mean that Alinsky-ism was pro-Middle Class or embraced American Middle Class values. Instead, it sought to change Middle Class values by pandering to Middle Class fears, anxieties, and hopes. Radicals would cut their hairs, act all-American, put on respectable three piece suits, and go among Middle Americans, work through mainline churches, and penetrate Middle Class culture. Through control of education and media, they would gradually persuade Middle Americans that there was something fundamentally lacking or wrong in their lives and in America. This missing element could be economic, spiritual, moral, or psychological.
Alinksky-ism is the most dangerous kind of subversive-ism as it comes with a hug and a smile, flowers and chocolates; it is radicalism made(or feigning to be) respectable and ‘safe’. Just as some radical leftists in the US served international communism by pretending to be for PEACE, Alinsky radicals served their hidden brand of radicalism by pretending to be for Middle Americans. (Of course, some of these radicals were indeed very much into Middle American life and fooled themselves about being radicals only to add some socio-intellectual spice to their humdrum lives. How much cooler if a suburban or yuppie couple flattered themselves as being part of some intellectual underground!)
We know that Obama and his close IDEOLOGICAL associates don’t care for Middle America. Obama is, at heart, a black internationalist and a stealth Marxist. He wants to take white wealth and give it to ‘exploited’ people-of-color around the world, mostly to black Americans and black Africans. Of course, Obama knows he can’t do this overnight as people will wake up and see his black ass for what it is. So, he’s in the Jackie Robinson mode of politics. He knows that national politics still has a long way to go to catch up to the NFL and NBA level, which are so black-dominated that blacks can say and do as they please. Recall that when blacks first entered professional sports, they were met with fear and suspicion from white players and fans, and so they had to act like they were nice gentle fellows who simply wanted to play ball and get along. So, we had guys like Jackie Robinson as the face of Integration in sports. Whites were assured that some nice Negroes would come and play, and that would be that. Well, look at the NBA and NFL today!
Obama knows that national politics is still in the age of Jackie Robinson, so he smiles a lot and acts partly like a nice and polite ‘House Negro’. But, it’s all just an act.
Now, good many educated people must know what Obama is really about. They read books, watch the news, read magazines, and etc. Even if the media are slanted to the Democratic Party and favor Obama, anyone with any brains and knowledge should know what he really is, what he really stands for, and where he came from. So, why do intelligent and well-educated white liberals and leftists go along with a man who built his career on deception, manipulation, two-faced-ness, and shrewd cunning? It’s because they find it all very exciting and feel that they themselves are IN on the Big Lie. This may sound crazy. One may indeed ask why intelligent and well-educated people would find pleasure or seek pride in participating in a Grand Lie. It’s because radicalism has long been very chic and hip among well-educated folks. You and I may see radicals as a bunch of extremists, but educated folks and intellectuals think RADICALISM is where real truth(or the spirit of truth) is, what the grand future holds, where real values lie, where real courage and purity can be found, where no compromises are made. For radicals, subversion is the necessary weapon against a society that is all too compromised–and requires everyone to compromise and conform to the oppressive Middle Norm to get along. (According to the Frankfurter left-wing Jewish intellectuals, Middle America offered false freedom, sham liberty, and a form of oppression that fooled people into thinking they were free through commodity-centric consumerism and socially normative conformism where one gauged one’s worth by keeping up with the Joneses. Though leftist and radical, this theory expressed the contempt and snobbery of European elite culture toward ‘materialistic’ Americans. For European intellectuals, materialism was a philosophy for understanding the world as it really operated. For Americans, materialism was a way of life where one’s happiness and ‘freedom’ were measured by how much material wealth one accumulated and enjoyed like silly little children. So, even as Frankfurter School intellectuals were egalitarians, they exhaled elitist contempt for mass society. According to Marxism, capitalism was supposed to make the masses poorer, and intellectuals were supposed to lead them to freedom. But, in America, the great masses had no desire for revolution since they ‘never had it so good’. Through the prism of Marxist theory, it was not acceptable that American capitalism had improved the lives of workers and ordinary people and expanded their freedoms. Since Frankfurters couldn’t find open oppression, they looked for invisible oppression in the hidden structures of society and people’s thoughts. From this arose Radical Feminism which argued that housewives were psychologically like Holocaust victims and Alinksy-ism which said Middle Americans were slaves but just didn’t know it because they ‘had it so good’. Since Middle America could not be convinced that their lives were horrible based on material evidence, the left had to play on emotional and psychological issues, which was why Marxism and Freudian psychology merged in the social sciences dominated by the Left.) Since subversion is deceitful, it merely pretends to compromise while concealing the radicalism within. Real compromise in a democracy is where two people openly and honestly come to an understanding and accept the compromise as just. Leftist radicals don’t think or act this way. Alinsky told his students to act as if to compromise, all the while gaining more and more power until the day arrives when they can take total power. For people who really believe in democracy, compromise is a worthy goal. For radicals, it is merely a means in order to gain greater and greater power untilthey can grab ALL the power. Salvador Allende of Chile was that kind of radical. So is Hugo Chavez. The reason why Chavez moves gradually is not because he likes to compromise and work with the other side. Instead, he wants to make it seem(especially to outsiders) as though the people democratically granted him ALL the power. Similarly, Hitler was a radical with a purist ideology who employed democratic compromise only as a tool in order to gain more and more power so as to eventually do everything his way.
We must never confuse compromise-as-goal with compromise-as-means. The former is made in good faith, the latter in bad faith. People who embrace compromise-as-goal regard it as a hallmark of a true democracy. People who employ compromise-as-means look forward to the day when they no longer need to compromise since they will have ALL the power. US is moving in that direction, not necessarily because of the rise of Obama but because of the increasing power of the liberal and left-wing Jews. Consider an average white goy whose total wealth may be around $30,000 in the bank. Compare that to people like Michael Bloomburg who’s worth $15 billion. That means that Michael Bloomburg’s net worth is equal to that of 500,000 white goyim. One rich liberal Jew = half a million white goyim. There are many liberal Jews with that kind of wealth and power, and they’ve come to own all the networks. Even the so-called conservative movies are made by liberal Hollywood, which means the profits made from conservative ticket buyers go to liberal Jews just the same. Many conservatives appreciated Spielberg’s "Saving Private Ryan" as a patriotic movie, and 100s of millions of dollars flowed into Spielberg’s coffers. So, how did Spielberg the liberal Jew honor this country that did so much for Jews? He helped elect Barack Obama, the stealth Marxist. Nearly half of all billionaires in the US are Jews, and most of them are liberal. Even so-called conservative businesses like Walmart are largely managed by top Jews, most of whom are liberal. Same is true of Fox News. We can grumble all we want, but the fact is Jews are smarter. Worse, conservative culture is largely stupid, un- and anti-creative, and simple-minded.
Anyway, affluent whites grew up watching movies, listening to popular music, and getting fancy education. All those things inculcate and celebrate radicalism as cool, cutting-edge, badass, heroic, exciting, far-out, and groovy. Some got radical chic or radical hip through Matrix movies, some got it through punk music, some got it through Che t-shirts, some got it through Rolling Stone magazine, some got it from their highschool teachers, some got it from books, some picked it up in college.
Frankfurters were wrong about Americans not being free, but they were right about American popular culture producing mental and spiritual zombies, gimps, and airheads. Intellectually vapid and spiritually empty in a vast pop cultural and consumerist wasteland, many Americans–everyone from college students to housewives glued to the Tube–were bound to be won over by at least certain aspects of radicalism. This transformation also involved many conservatives. After having grown up in the staid or banal culture of Christian fundamentalism, small town hick values, or colorless suburbia, many kids raised as conservatives found meaning in radicalism.
Generally, leftists own radicalism, but there’s also radicalism on the right, especially libertarianism and Ayn-Rand-ism. Libertarianism’s main attraction is its purity and un-compromised ideologic. Though libertarianism will never gain power, it makes a lot of rightists feel good about their un-compromised ‘integrity’. Libertarians don’t seem to understand that their brand of radicalism is useless for gaining power because it is anti-statist. How can you gain political power if you’re anti-government? Just as anarchism lost out to the communism, libertarianism always loses out to liberalism. All libertarianism can do is appeal to people to be more self-reliant, but truth be told, many people don’t want to be self-reliant as it means not only more freedom but more responsibility. They would rather shove the burden and cost to government. Of course, some people choose libertarianism precisely because it has no hope of ever coming to power. Some radicals want power, but some radicals just want to feel nobler-than-thou and pretend that the reason why power is denied them is because they are just too good, too smart, too pure, and too deep for the stupid crass world. Lost-Cause-Libertarianism is really just a form of intellectual-moral-narcissism.
Anyway, the reason why so many intelligent and well-educated people support Obama is they see themselves not as dupes but as the dupers or ones participating in Obama’s dupe-a-rube routine. They see Obama, a student of Alinsky, as their leader and comrade in hoodwinking the entire nation, especially Middle America. But, one may ask, "didn’t many of these smart and well-educated white Americans come from Middle America? Aren’t they subverting their own world and their own power?" Yes and no. Yes, many of them are indeed the products of Middle America. But, there is Middle America as economic status and Middle America as heart-and-soul. Many economic Middle Americans are culturally, spiritually, and politically ‘radical’ since they grew up on stuff like Matrix, rock music and its related politics, liberal or leftist education. Just as many rich people have been leftists and many poor people have been rightists, it is wrong to think that economic status = political/spiritual/cultural identity. If such were the case, Karl Marx, born and raised in privilege, would not have become a radical socialist. Entire generations of kids have been raised on left-colored music, movies, magazines, textbooks, teachers, media. Though Hitler is said to have been evil, evil, and evil by our media and academia, the same has not been accorded to the mass killers of the Left. Though Stalin and Mao are remembered for their evil, the general liberal line is that they committed evil because they betrayed their leftist principles. In other words, Hitler was evil because he was indeed a true rightist whereas Stalin and Mao were evil because they weren’t properly leftist. So, rightism is evil for what it is whereas leftism can be evil only for what’s done in its name. In and of itself as an idea, leftism is supposedly of the highest moral order.
Marxism has a place in the West similar to that of Christianity. Christians feel that they cannot live up to the highest principles of Christianity and that trying to create a Christian utopia may actually do more harm. They reject theocracy not because a world ruled by God’s laws would be bad but because man cannot be trusted to rule the world according to God’s wisdom. Even so, Christians believe that Jesus was a perfect man and that it would be nice IF INDEED we could all live in a perfect Christian world. In other words, the problem is not in the ideas of Christianity but in the sinful nature of man who makes a mockery of those ideas.
Liberals and leftists feel the same way about Marxism. Though they acknowledge the miserable history of communism and accept the fact that communism failed as a totalitarian or ideocratic system, they believe that Marxism as an idea still holds the highest principles of Human Justice. In other words, it’s no so much that communism failed mankind but that mankind failed (to live up to) communism. Liberals and leftist reject communism or Marxism not because they think it’s a bad idea but because they think it’s an unattainable Great Idea. In contrast, fascism is regarded as evil in both ideology and practice(as opposed to communism which is supposedly good in ideology but was bad in practice–because stupid man couldn’t live up to its noble and demanding ideals).
So, even as liberals and leftist reject classic communism, they spiritually long for the Marxist promise. This isn’t surprising since man is naturally ‘spiritual’ and seeks something to cling to with his deep emotions and prophetic imagination. Christianity isn’t enough for their spiritual needs because (1) liberals and leftists are supposed to be rationalist and scientific and immune to ‘superstition’ (2) Christianity is 2000 yrs old, too old for modern people with a fetish for the New. (Though Marxism too is pretty old by now, it’s been repackaged time and time again as a fresh idea. Consider that with the recent financial collapse, some liberals are pushing Marx as relevant again (3) much of Christianity is culturally associated with the Right.
So, liberals and leftists prefer Marx to Jesus. Even liberals and leftists who readily admit that Marx got it wrong maintain that he was a man of the highest intellect, moral character, seriousness, noble intentions, and so on. Just as Moses has been revered by Jews for having led the way despite his major flaws, even ‘progressives’ who now admit that Marx had been wrong on crucial issues and ideas still revere him for what he stood and strived for. They believe that even if Marx ultimately proved to be wrong, his bold and determined search for Truth should be the template for all true intellectuals with a moral stake in the world.
What appeals to many liberals and leftists about Marx is his total devotion to the radical calling. Marx chose the life of a ‘starving radical’ through and through(though, to be sure, he had rich patrons who supported him time and time again). Most liberals and leftists feel that they ‘sold out’ and feel guilty and compromised as a result. They grew up with fancy ideas about justice and saving-the-world by gaining wealth and power, but most of them turn out to be affluent and privileged professionals or businessmen. And, even the less successful spend a lot of time scrambling to make more money and get ahead in life. There’s nothing wrong with this per se, but something in their education and cultural experiences/preferences informs them that it’s so lame and a waste of a life to be a privileged materialistic yuppie who lives the Ugly American lifestyle. They long to be AUTHENTIC, and you can’t attain that brand by being a middle class middle of the road white yuppie!! The only way you can buy some Authenticity is by supporting some ‘radical’ cause, listening to Afro-pop and calling for more aid to Africa, going on travels to less developed places around the world where pristine cultures haven’t yet been spoiled by rich materialistic Western people–as opposed to ‘caring’, ‘sensitive’, ‘cool’, and ‘progressive’ Western people such as themselves.
Just as materialistic and compromised Christians attend church on Sunday and seek forgiveness for their sins and trespasses, modern liberals and leftists pray to Marx and Martin(the Noble Negro) for their compromises with the materialist ‘greed’.
Che Guevara is also very appealing to modern liberals and leftists because he, like Marx, supposedly went all the way and compromised nothing. If Marx was intellectually 100% committed and courageous, Che was physically 100% committed and courageous. He died in the jungles of Bolivia, and attained the status of new Jesus for the New Left. Of course, most actual liberals and leftist are more like Naomi Klein. They want their yuppie privilege, fancy condos, fine dining, expensive coffee, travels and tourism to exotic places, and etc. Though politically, culturally, and spiritually raised to be leftists, they are the beneficiaries of the ‘capitalist-imperialist’ system. So, they latch onto something that gives them meaning and assures them that they are indeed involved in the radical revolution, if only indirectly or in spirit. Some affluent ‘progressives’ find radical redemption by vacationing in Cuba, smoking Cuban cigars, going to rock concerts where the star-as-saint yammers between songs on saving the rain forest/feeding the hungry in Africa/impeaching George W. Bush.
Anyway, the point is that many leftists and liberals know what Obama is about and up to. They know all about his Alinsky past and his far left sympathies. They know that Obama is a subversive radical. But, this excites than disturbs them since they too grew up with the notion that being ‘radical’, ‘revolutionary’, ‘subversive’, and so forth is cool. Indeed, being straight and forthright are considered white, middle-class, and lame. Educated people who listen to NPR and watch PBS prefer slick and sly jazz to straight-forward country music or even sober & dignified classical music. Obama is a radical slickster and jive-master, but being a subversive, he also knows how to feign earnestness. He knows how to pull the Will Smith schtick in ‘Six Degrees of Separation’.
That’s what makes him subversive as opposed to people like Malcolm X who were radical and anti-mainstream but not subversive. Malcolm X was straight forward in everything he said, regardless of whether they happen to be true or false, sane or insane. In contrast, Obama always wears masks, and he must be understood in terms of an actor in a blockbuster movie financed and written by liberal Jews. He’s their Will Smith in politics.
Anyway, though ‘subversive’ has negative connotations for conservatives, it’s a badge of honor for leftists and even many liberals. It means being cutting-edge, daring, cool, exciting, rebellious, slick, tricky, witty, and brilliant. Just as con-men take pride in their ability to trick people, many ‘progressives’ take pride in fooling and hoodwinking the lame, banal, bland, and dull white middle class. ‘Progressive’ subversives also take moral pride since they believe their deviously naughty fun will bring about ‘social justice’. (It’s a matter of having the cake and eating it too. They get to have fun playing bad boys and girls rebelling against The System, but miraculously the end result of all this conceited and contrived game is supposed to be the Better Future. Of course, there has long been a connection between the super-rich and the radicals, not least because the super-rich are vain, narcissistic, and want to share in the fun of being ‘progressive’ and ‘revolutionary’ in the locomotive seat of history. So, it’s not surprising that many rich people have tried to appropriate the radical style, rhetoric, outlooks, and manners. In a way, the rise of Obama is the product of an understanding between the liberal super-rich business class and the super-privileged Ivy League radicals. Obama is like the most expensive political doll built or bought by the super-rich class who, having amassed tremendous fortunes in the past 30 yrs, want to play at being big government socialists by pulling the (purse)strings of their toy radical puppet. In this sense, Obama is to the rich liberal Jews what Will Smith is to Hollywood Jews.)
It’s surprising that many ‘progressives’ come from the white middle class, but it’s not hard to understand why that is. Having come from Middle America, they feel lame and inadequate(as middle class America is depicted that way by popular culture and higher education), and many seek meaning and excitement though radical politics, subcultures, or avant-garde intellectualism. Look on youtube and you find a whole bunch of bedroom philosophers and kitchen table revolutionaries speaking into the digicam to prove that they are not just another lame middle class person but a member of the avant garde or some cool secret society or movement. And so, when conservatives point out Obama’s Alinsky past, many ‘progressives’ think it’s so cool that Obama is a subversive, wink wink.
Of course, there is genuine awe and admiration for Obama on the part of many liberals and leftists, among both the duped and duplicitous. But, how can the duplicitous who know what Obama is really about look upon him as a ‘shining prince’? It’s because the human mind is infinitely complex and can fool itself in countless ways. Yes, it’s possible for even cynical and subversive duplicitous individuals to fall under the spell. Man is half intellect, half emotions.
‘Progressives’ have long sought a racial healer or a deliverer who embodies the positive qualities of Kennedy, King, FDR, Lincoln, Oprah, and Malcolm X. So came Obama, the master of many masks. (Even makers of masks can fall for their own masks, just like liars can come to believe in their own lies, and fabulists can fall for their own fantasies. It’s like the spider is forever the prisoner of the web it spins.) Also, no matter how subversive or cynical ‘progressives’ may be, their deepest core is enervated by a naive quasi-religious view of world salvation. Leftists may be tricky and sly on the outside, but their inside hugs-n-tugs an innocent child who wants the world to be perfect. So, strange as it may seem, not only the duped but even the duplicitous can get carried away by the Obama cult.
This was true of communist movements as well. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, many communist members were subversive, ruthless, hard-nosed, and pitiless. But, many of them did indeed believe in the shining myth of Stalin EVEN WHEN THEY KNEW that Stalin gained and maintained his power through the dirtiest and the most sinister of means. All people need something to stake their faith in, especially idealists. Therefore, even people who would later be crushed by Stalin died believing in the noble myth of the all-knowing Big Brother.
Similarly, on the one hand, many ‘progressives’ are deeply skeptical, sly, cynical, and cunning people. They are subversive. On the other, they are naive and quasi-religious idealists intoxicated with faith in a Better Future. They have this powerful need to attach onto some Great Theory or Great Personality. So, even those who know Obama for what he is are willing to project onto him their hopes and delusions. Even the duplicitous are capable of duping themselves. Obama, of course, knows this, how it works, and how to manipulate it. He knows that many of his followers are the duped while others are duplicitous. But, he also knows that even the duplicitous have a certain psychology that needs to cling to a Great Faith or Myth, and he knows how to play to those emotions. Even the smartest person responds to the world rationally only 50%. The other 50% is affected by sights, sounds, rhythm, texture, the groove and style, etc. This is why a man as smart as Einstein could fall for socialism or delude himself that Gandhi is a great saint.
Jesus said man doesn’t live on bread alone. It’s also true that man doesn’t live on ideas alone. The ideas he espouses must be attached, embodied, and expressed by a personality. Personality gives life to ideas. So, the "I Have a Dream" speech was just an idea from the pen of a Jewish writer. It came to life only with the delivery by Martin Luther King. King gave Life to those ideas, and in a way, became the very embodiment of or even bigger than those ideas. Today, his message of Love and Peace mean nothing to most blacks who listen to rap music and demand racial favoritism. But, the cult of King-the-personality is bigger than ever. Ideas become personified, and the person becomes mythified. In the end, the meaning of the ideas takes a backseat to the Myth of those ideas as embodied by The Great Personality. Same is true of what has become of Mao in China. Chinese no longer care for his communist ideas but still revere him as a symbol of Chinese unity, glory, pride, and power. Maoism isn’t no longer about actually following Mao’s ideas by the letter but celebrating the spirit of those ideas by adapting them into symbols of nationalist power and glory.
Similarly, blacks embrace Martin Luther King personality cult not because they believe in color-blindness or peace but because the cult guarantees them automatic moral superiority and racial pride. White ‘progressives’ cling to the King cult either out of opportunism, naive idealism, or radicalism. Scared conservative opportunists want to use the King cult to argue against racial favoritism(‘content of character’ over ‘color of skin’) and to persuade blacks to choose peace over violence. Liberals cling to the King cult in the hope that some kind of racial harmony may prevail. Radicals want to use the King cult as a Trojan Horse tactic to fool white people into dropping their guards against the rise of black and Jewish power.
Anyway, just as King imbued white liberal ideas of 60s with Music and Charisma, Obama aims to do the same today. Again, we see a similar set-up and pattern. Most of the writers are Jewish. Jews have great intellect and cunning but not much in the way of charisma. Blacks have that hormone charged intensity but aren’t much for ideas. We saw this in pop music too. Brill Building was largely made up of Jewish songwriters, but many of the singers were black. Jews supplied the songs, and blacks delivered the performances. Of course, Jews did this with whites too. Jewish Hollywood came up with screenplays but found big tall handsome goyim to bring the pages to life. Ayn Rand the Jewess wrote the novel and screenplay of "The Fountainhead" but big tall handsome Gary Cooper brought it to life. Milton Friedman was the funny looking yoda-like man of ideas behind Reaganomics, but Reagan was the man who gave it a face that inspired millions. Jews are brilliant, smart, and/or cunningl but tend to be gnome-like and funny looking. They need to partner up with the ‘Aryan’ or the ‘Negro’. In the past, Jews used ‘Aryans’ like Charlton Heston to popularize their artistic ideas and political values. Today, ‘Aryans’ have been vilified and dehumanized while Negroes have been elevated in their place. But, the people who are still financing this and writing the script are the Jews. Even in the conservative movement, the writers have often been people like David Frum, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, etc.
Many white liberals and leftists see themselves as people of brilliance, knowledge, intelligence, and ideals. But, they feel that they themselves lack either charisma or the moral right to preach to the world about a Better Future. After all, leftist history says white people are to blame for all the evils in the world. Of course, Jews are exempt from ‘white guilt’ but good many of them tend to look funny and have annoying public personas. Anyway, most white people feel that they don’t have the right to be moral leaders or exemplars because of the morally stained history of white people.
With white liberals, the problem is compounded by the fact that they’ve also burdened also themselves with American guilt, whereby Americans are supposed to apologize to the rest of world, especially to Europeans, for being too powerful, being too rich, and consuming too much.
Therefore, many ‘progressives’ have wanted a ‘person of color’–innocent of the sins of Western History–to lead the way, but most blacks turned out to be crazy and unfit for this role. Even Martin Luther King, observed closely, was a scumbag in private life. Liberals felt they had the message but not the proper messenger nor the ‘perfect storm’ through which their ideas could be embraced by most people. Of course, conservatives too had a similar problem for a long time before Reagan finally came along during the Perfect Storm of 1980.
Conservatives felt they had strong and solid ideas but suffered an image problem in the 60s-70s. There was the granite-faced not-very-likable Goldwater, the dark and shadowy Nixon, and the inept Ford. The great conservative moment came when Reagan arrived on the scene just when the Carter administration was in total free fall. The Great Communicator had the physical and charismatic instruments to deliver those ideas to the public at large. He had a way of making conservative theories sound simple and accessible, even inspirational. He persuaded people as to why America needs a strong military and how that could restore American pride and power.
Just as a bomb, no matter how well-conceived, is useless without a missile to deliver it to its target, an idea is useless unless there is a personality that can deliver it far and wide to the public. Otherwise, it remains a just another intellectual idea or policy proposal. Conservatives really had to wait until 1980 for a man like Reagan to arrive.
Democrats thought their star had arrived with Clinton, but Billy boy turned out to be too rascally and childish(and out of control). Clinton let everyone down. So, Obama is the New Hope. If Clinton was the first black white president(prone to reckless self-destruction), Obama is like the first white black president(disciplined in terms of what he needs to do). Therefore, many liberals are crazy about Obama for this reason for the Messiah of the Great Liberal Message has finally arrived.
Obama is the great missile that white liberals–especially the Jews–have been waiting for all these yrs to carry their message all the way to the Moon. He is the political equivalent of the Final Frontier. He’s the (Rock)Star Child of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
White liberals have had Grand Ideas they’d wanted to implement for a long time but all their missiles proved to be duds or faulty. Duds were Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry. The ambitious but ultimately flawed missile was Clinton. There was Hillary with the Great Healthcare Plan but she lacked the charisma and ‘character’ to deliver it on target to the American public. Many people just didn’t warm to her nor trust her. They saw her as overly shrewd, cold, arrogant, and calculating. (Obama is no different but he knows how to seem different, at least to all the dupes out there.)
But, liberals now have Obama, perfect in the age of Will Smith, Oprah, and Hip Hop(when most young white people are more into blackness than whiteness). He’s supposed to be the super missile that delivers all the Neo-New Deal ideas right on target. Liberals are further emboldened by the fact that 2008 has been a year of the Perfect Storm. 8 yrs of Bush made the white male unfashionable. Bush was a poor missile who never hit the target; his public persona was especially a disaster. His words seem to drip out of his mouth like saliva. The Iraq War as long, painful, and costly. The economic meltdown of 2008 played into liberal hands since the blame usually goes to the party in power. McCain had the wrong image–weak voice, old face, wobbly body, etc–in a nation that’s into hip hop culture and youth narcissism. Also, Obama as a missile could rely on support of the launching pad and airspace–liberal Jewish controlled media and academia.
Anyway, when white liberals and leftists see Obama, they don’t just see a fellow duplicitous subversive radical, but the deliverer that has finally arrived to take the liberal (Jewish) ideas to their intended targets. He is the giant mythical bird that has finally arrived to take liberal ideas to the promised land. He’s supposed to finally finish what FDR started, what Kennedy failed to achieve due to the assassination, what LBJ failed to accomplish due to Vietnam War, what King failed to reach due to assassination, what Robert J. Kennedy failed to bring forth due to assassination, what Humphrey failed to do thanks to 60s out-of-control radicalism, what Carter failed to do due to his incompetence and bad luck, what Clinton failed to do thanks to his self-destructiveness, what Gore failed to do thanks to GOP having ‘stolen’ the election. In the liberal Grand Narrative, history was stolen from them by tragedies, accidents, bad luck, recklessness, etc. Obama is supposed to embody the perfect balance between white and black, between religious and secular, between national and international, between elitism and egalitarianism, between intellectualism and populism, between confidence and humility, between hip and the hop. So the stupid liberals think in their Hollywood-induced fantasies, as though mankind can be redeemed by mindless social engineering and pop-political gimcracks.
No less funny was the delusions of the Bush administration and many gentile whites in this country. White gentiles still seem to think they control America when they do not. The rulers of this country are liberal and leftist Jews. Liberal and leftist Jews dominate Ideas, Education, Information, Knowledge, History, and what we see, hear, and read. NY, the financial and intellectual capital, is mostly Jewish. LA, the pop cultural capital, is mostly Jewish. Northwest Coast, the center of high-tech billionaires, is dominated by Jews. Pharmaceutical companies are dominated by Jews. Most Jews are liberal or leftist. Most of the powerful lawyers are Jewish.
Yet, people like Bush and McCain still act as though white gentiles have all the power and therefore must be generous, kind, and tolerant of other people WHEN IN FACT the real people in power are the liberal and left-wing Jews(and their brainwashed goy allies and puppets)whose determined goal is to destroy and bring down white power, white interests, white unity, white pride, and the white race.
There’s a weird relationship between gentile whites and Jews, especially in the GOP. Though Jews are the most powerful people in this country, the political charade between white gentiles and Jews requires that white gentiles pretend that they have the power(and therefore must be overly kind and generous to others) in exchange for Jewish financial and intellectual support.
We have pretty much the same situation in Hollywood where Jews have the money and power, but they put forth bigshot gentile stars who give the false impression that Hollywood is dominated by people like Tom Cruise or Angelina Jolie. As the public face of Hollywood, gentiles are supposed to act like they rule and control Hollywood(and therefore be exposed to endless scrutiny and accountability)whereas the truly powerful Jews remain behind the scenes and amass bigger fortunes and gain greater power without any scrutiny whatsoever. We can see this with guys like Charlie Rose too. Having Charlie Rose as interviewer gives the impression that WASPS still control the media, but he’s just a puppet of Jews who really control the media. Well, that’s just how it goes.
We have seen countless images of swooning crowds at the feet of Obama. He is their Jesus, their Leader, their Lord, their Prophet. He might even be their Will Smith or Oprah. Many of these people tend not be well-informed nor too bright. Many of them are young, which means they are impressionable and prone to social and cultural pressure. (Though young are said to be rebellious, most happen to be slavish to peer pressure; even oddballs who take pride in their deviation from The Norm are acutely aware of their social exile, and as such, even their rebellion is a form of emotional slavishness. They need to prove themselves out of a sense of inadequacy.) Many of these people surely heard of reports of Obama’s sleazy Chicago politics or his many lies. But, they are essentially emotional people who respond to images and sounds than think rationally about issues. Once they’ve latched onto Obama, he’s their ‘rock star’ hero; and, whenever in doubt, they go into the ‘say it aint so, Joe’ mode. They WANT to believe that Obama is the savior. This desire is so powerful that evidence to the contrary doesn’t make much impact. The ONLY way they can be woken out of their doldrums is if the media finally do their job and go after Obama for all his lies and expose and shame him. Only if the authority higher than Obama–the liberal Jewish-run media–says he’s no good will the sheeple who worship him finally come to realize he’s a false god. Many of these people are good people, fine people. They are like the dupes in "MEET JOHN DOE". They so desperately want to believe in hope and change and a bright future where everyone gets along–especially whites and blacks–that they don’t want to know the truth about Obama. It would break their hearts and force them to think and use their brains–something they are not equipped to do. As they happen to be intellectually limited, they would rather believe in mantras and symbols. Whenever they hear bad things about Obama, they pray,‘say it aint so, O’. ONLY IF the media seriously go after Obama and expose him in a serious way will the minds of these people change. Remember that in "MEET JOHN DOE", the rich and powerful had to unite and expose Doe as a ‘fake’ before the minds of people finally changed. Obama supporters are just like that.
This of course raises a question. How can so many people be so stupid? Well, they just are. Why do so many Americans prefer stupid TV shows and movies to serious literature and art cinema? And, this is a problem in both camps. Remember that conservatives went with the mediocre George W. Bush because he promoted himself as a pious man of God and a ‘regular guy’–though he was born with a silver spoon his mouth. Many people are dumb.
But you may ask, ‘but, how come so many intelligent and well-educated people also support Obama?’ Why did 50% of upper middle class people vote for Obama? Why did the majority of very rich people support Obama? Why was Obama’s support so overwhelming among the Ivory Tower crowd in the academia.
There are many reasons for this, and let me run them down as fast as possible. (1) Higher education these days means higher indoctrination where thinking CORRECTLY counts for more than thinking FREELY. (2) People with most education tend to come from the privileged class, which means they have had little contact with REAL reality, and as such, are prone to be more naively idealistic. (3) The rich, at least white gentile kind, tend to feel a degree of guilt and ‘social obligation’ since this country was founded upon Christian ethos which says ‘greed is evil’. So, one could argue that even intelligent and well-educated people can be duped or can dupe themselves. They are human after all.
But, there’s another reason why well-educated people–often in influential or powerful positions–support Obama. It’s not so much that they are duped but that they are duplicitous. Conservatives sometimes wonder why so many well-educated and intelligent people aren’t troubled by the fact that Obama is of the Saul Alinsky school. Anyone who has paid attention to the news knows that Obama’s intellectual influences and political associations are pretty radical. We know that Alinsky-ism isn’t open and honest but subversive, cunning, and deceitful. It is the strategy of shrewd and devious ‘progressives’ manipulating the gullibility and stupidity of Middle Americans. Alinsky deviated from other radicals and came to the conclusion that Middle Americans had to serve as the clay for revolution. America didn’t have masses of poor, and the classic working class was shrinking. So, no great social change could be achieved without the support or involvement of the vast Middle Class. Alinsky-ism was about playing to Middle Class anxieties, fears, doubts, guilt, naivete, and hope. This didn’t mean that Alinsky-ism was pro-Middle Class or embraced American Middle Class values. Instead, it sought to change Middle Class values by pandering to Middle Class fears, anxieties, and hopes. Radicals would cut their hairs, act all-American, put on respectable three piece suits, and go among Middle Americans, work through mainline churches, and penetrate Middle Class culture. Through control of education and media, they would gradually persuade Middle Americans that there was something fundamentally lacking or wrong in their lives and in America. This missing element could be economic, spiritual, moral, or psychological.
Alinksky-ism is the most dangerous kind of subversive-ism as it comes with a hug and a smile, flowers and chocolates; it is radicalism made(or feigning to be) respectable and ‘safe’. Just as some radical leftists in the US served international communism by pretending to be for PEACE, Alinsky radicals served their hidden brand of radicalism by pretending to be for Middle Americans. (Of course, some of these radicals were indeed very much into Middle American life and fooled themselves about being radicals only to add some socio-intellectual spice to their humdrum lives. How much cooler if a suburban or yuppie couple flattered themselves as being part of some intellectual underground!)
We know that Obama and his close IDEOLOGICAL associates don’t care for Middle America. Obama is, at heart, a black internationalist and a stealth Marxist. He wants to take white wealth and give it to ‘exploited’ people-of-color around the world, mostly to black Americans and black Africans. Of course, Obama knows he can’t do this overnight as people will wake up and see his black ass for what it is. So, he’s in the Jackie Robinson mode of politics. He knows that national politics still has a long way to go to catch up to the NFL and NBA level, which are so black-dominated that blacks can say and do as they please. Recall that when blacks first entered professional sports, they were met with fear and suspicion from white players and fans, and so they had to act like they were nice gentle fellows who simply wanted to play ball and get along. So, we had guys like Jackie Robinson as the face of Integration in sports. Whites were assured that some nice Negroes would come and play, and that would be that. Well, look at the NBA and NFL today!
Obama knows that national politics is still in the age of Jackie Robinson, so he smiles a lot and acts partly like a nice and polite ‘House Negro’. But, it’s all just an act.
Now, good many educated people must know what Obama is really about. They read books, watch the news, read magazines, and etc. Even if the media are slanted to the Democratic Party and favor Obama, anyone with any brains and knowledge should know what he really is, what he really stands for, and where he came from. So, why do intelligent and well-educated white liberals and leftists go along with a man who built his career on deception, manipulation, two-faced-ness, and shrewd cunning? It’s because they find it all very exciting and feel that they themselves are IN on the Big Lie. This may sound crazy. One may indeed ask why intelligent and well-educated people would find pleasure or seek pride in participating in a Grand Lie. It’s because radicalism has long been very chic and hip among well-educated folks. You and I may see radicals as a bunch of extremists, but educated folks and intellectuals think RADICALISM is where real truth(or the spirit of truth) is, what the grand future holds, where real values lie, where real courage and purity can be found, where no compromises are made. For radicals, subversion is the necessary weapon against a society that is all too compromised–and requires everyone to compromise and conform to the oppressive Middle Norm to get along. (According to the Frankfurter left-wing Jewish intellectuals, Middle America offered false freedom, sham liberty, and a form of oppression that fooled people into thinking they were free through commodity-centric consumerism and socially normative conformism where one gauged one’s worth by keeping up with the Joneses. Though leftist and radical, this theory expressed the contempt and snobbery of European elite culture toward ‘materialistic’ Americans. For European intellectuals, materialism was a philosophy for understanding the world as it really operated. For Americans, materialism was a way of life where one’s happiness and ‘freedom’ were measured by how much material wealth one accumulated and enjoyed like silly little children. So, even as Frankfurter School intellectuals were egalitarians, they exhaled elitist contempt for mass society. According to Marxism, capitalism was supposed to make the masses poorer, and intellectuals were supposed to lead them to freedom. But, in America, the great masses had no desire for revolution since they ‘never had it so good’. Through the prism of Marxist theory, it was not acceptable that American capitalism had improved the lives of workers and ordinary people and expanded their freedoms. Since Frankfurters couldn’t find open oppression, they looked for invisible oppression in the hidden structures of society and people’s thoughts. From this arose Radical Feminism which argued that housewives were psychologically like Holocaust victims and Alinksy-ism which said Middle Americans were slaves but just didn’t know it because they ‘had it so good’. Since Middle America could not be convinced that their lives were horrible based on material evidence, the left had to play on emotional and psychological issues, which was why Marxism and Freudian psychology merged in the social sciences dominated by the Left.) Since subversion is deceitful, it merely pretends to compromise while concealing the radicalism within. Real compromise in a democracy is where two people openly and honestly come to an understanding and accept the compromise as just. Leftist radicals don’t think or act this way. Alinsky told his students to act as if to compromise, all the while gaining more and more power until the day arrives when they can take total power. For people who really believe in democracy, compromise is a worthy goal. For radicals, it is merely a means in order to gain greater and greater power untilthey can grab ALL the power. Salvador Allende of Chile was that kind of radical. So is Hugo Chavez. The reason why Chavez moves gradually is not because he likes to compromise and work with the other side. Instead, he wants to make it seem(especially to outsiders) as though the people democratically granted him ALL the power. Similarly, Hitler was a radical with a purist ideology who employed democratic compromise only as a tool in order to gain more and more power so as to eventually do everything his way.
We must never confuse compromise-as-goal with compromise-as-means. The former is made in good faith, the latter in bad faith. People who embrace compromise-as-goal regard it as a hallmark of a true democracy. People who employ compromise-as-means look forward to the day when they no longer need to compromise since they will have ALL the power. US is moving in that direction, not necessarily because of the rise of Obama but because of the increasing power of the liberal and left-wing Jews. Consider an average white goy whose total wealth may be around $30,000 in the bank. Compare that to people like Michael Bloomburg who’s worth $15 billion. That means that Michael Bloomburg’s net worth is equal to that of 500,000 white goyim. One rich liberal Jew = half a million white goyim. There are many liberal Jews with that kind of wealth and power, and they’ve come to own all the networks. Even the so-called conservative movies are made by liberal Hollywood, which means the profits made from conservative ticket buyers go to liberal Jews just the same. Many conservatives appreciated Spielberg’s "Saving Private Ryan" as a patriotic movie, and 100s of millions of dollars flowed into Spielberg’s coffers. So, how did Spielberg the liberal Jew honor this country that did so much for Jews? He helped elect Barack Obama, the stealth Marxist. Nearly half of all billionaires in the US are Jews, and most of them are liberal. Even so-called conservative businesses like Walmart are largely managed by top Jews, most of whom are liberal. Same is true of Fox News. We can grumble all we want, but the fact is Jews are smarter. Worse, conservative culture is largely stupid, un- and anti-creative, and simple-minded.
Anyway, affluent whites grew up watching movies, listening to popular music, and getting fancy education. All those things inculcate and celebrate radicalism as cool, cutting-edge, badass, heroic, exciting, far-out, and groovy. Some got radical chic or radical hip through Matrix movies, some got it through punk music, some got it through Che t-shirts, some got it through Rolling Stone magazine, some got it from their highschool teachers, some got it from books, some picked it up in college.
Frankfurters were wrong about Americans not being free, but they were right about American popular culture producing mental and spiritual zombies, gimps, and airheads. Intellectually vapid and spiritually empty in a vast pop cultural and consumerist wasteland, many Americans–everyone from college students to housewives glued to the Tube–were bound to be won over by at least certain aspects of radicalism. This transformation also involved many conservatives. After having grown up in the staid or banal culture of Christian fundamentalism, small town hick values, or colorless suburbia, many kids raised as conservatives found meaning in radicalism.
Generally, leftists own radicalism, but there’s also radicalism on the right, especially libertarianism and Ayn-Rand-ism. Libertarianism’s main attraction is its purity and un-compromised ideologic. Though libertarianism will never gain power, it makes a lot of rightists feel good about their un-compromised ‘integrity’. Libertarians don’t seem to understand that their brand of radicalism is useless for gaining power because it is anti-statist. How can you gain political power if you’re anti-government? Just as anarchism lost out to the communism, libertarianism always loses out to liberalism. All libertarianism can do is appeal to people to be more self-reliant, but truth be told, many people don’t want to be self-reliant as it means not only more freedom but more responsibility. They would rather shove the burden and cost to government. Of course, some people choose libertarianism precisely because it has no hope of ever coming to power. Some radicals want power, but some radicals just want to feel nobler-than-thou and pretend that the reason why power is denied them is because they are just too good, too smart, too pure, and too deep for the stupid crass world. Lost-Cause-Libertarianism is really just a form of intellectual-moral-narcissism.
Anyway, the reason why so many intelligent and well-educated people support Obama is they see themselves not as dupes but as the dupers or ones participating in Obama’s dupe-a-rube routine. They see Obama, a student of Alinsky, as their leader and comrade in hoodwinking the entire nation, especially Middle America. But, one may ask, "didn’t many of these smart and well-educated white Americans come from Middle America? Aren’t they subverting their own world and their own power?" Yes and no. Yes, many of them are indeed the products of Middle America. But, there is Middle America as economic status and Middle America as heart-and-soul. Many economic Middle Americans are culturally, spiritually, and politically ‘radical’ since they grew up on stuff like Matrix, rock music and its related politics, liberal or leftist education. Just as many rich people have been leftists and many poor people have been rightists, it is wrong to think that economic status = political/spiritual/cultural identity. If such were the case, Karl Marx, born and raised in privilege, would not have become a radical socialist. Entire generations of kids have been raised on left-colored music, movies, magazines, textbooks, teachers, media. Though Hitler is said to have been evil, evil, and evil by our media and academia, the same has not been accorded to the mass killers of the Left. Though Stalin and Mao are remembered for their evil, the general liberal line is that they committed evil because they betrayed their leftist principles. In other words, Hitler was evil because he was indeed a true rightist whereas Stalin and Mao were evil because they weren’t properly leftist. So, rightism is evil for what it is whereas leftism can be evil only for what’s done in its name. In and of itself as an idea, leftism is supposedly of the highest moral order.
Marxism has a place in the West similar to that of Christianity. Christians feel that they cannot live up to the highest principles of Christianity and that trying to create a Christian utopia may actually do more harm. They reject theocracy not because a world ruled by God’s laws would be bad but because man cannot be trusted to rule the world according to God’s wisdom. Even so, Christians believe that Jesus was a perfect man and that it would be nice IF INDEED we could all live in a perfect Christian world. In other words, the problem is not in the ideas of Christianity but in the sinful nature of man who makes a mockery of those ideas.
Liberals and leftists feel the same way about Marxism. Though they acknowledge the miserable history of communism and accept the fact that communism failed as a totalitarian or ideocratic system, they believe that Marxism as an idea still holds the highest principles of Human Justice. In other words, it’s no so much that communism failed mankind but that mankind failed (to live up to) communism. Liberals and leftist reject communism or Marxism not because they think it’s a bad idea but because they think it’s an unattainable Great Idea. In contrast, fascism is regarded as evil in both ideology and practice(as opposed to communism which is supposedly good in ideology but was bad in practice–because stupid man couldn’t live up to its noble and demanding ideals).
So, even as liberals and leftist reject classic communism, they spiritually long for the Marxist promise. This isn’t surprising since man is naturally ‘spiritual’ and seeks something to cling to with his deep emotions and prophetic imagination. Christianity isn’t enough for their spiritual needs because (1) liberals and leftists are supposed to be rationalist and scientific and immune to ‘superstition’ (2) Christianity is 2000 yrs old, too old for modern people with a fetish for the New. (Though Marxism too is pretty old by now, it’s been repackaged time and time again as a fresh idea. Consider that with the recent financial collapse, some liberals are pushing Marx as relevant again (3) much of Christianity is culturally associated with the Right.
So, liberals and leftists prefer Marx to Jesus. Even liberals and leftists who readily admit that Marx got it wrong maintain that he was a man of the highest intellect, moral character, seriousness, noble intentions, and so on. Just as Moses has been revered by Jews for having led the way despite his major flaws, even ‘progressives’ who now admit that Marx had been wrong on crucial issues and ideas still revere him for what he stood and strived for. They believe that even if Marx ultimately proved to be wrong, his bold and determined search for Truth should be the template for all true intellectuals with a moral stake in the world.
What appeals to many liberals and leftists about Marx is his total devotion to the radical calling. Marx chose the life of a ‘starving radical’ through and through(though, to be sure, he had rich patrons who supported him time and time again). Most liberals and leftists feel that they ‘sold out’ and feel guilty and compromised as a result. They grew up with fancy ideas about justice and saving-the-world by gaining wealth and power, but most of them turn out to be affluent and privileged professionals or businessmen. And, even the less successful spend a lot of time scrambling to make more money and get ahead in life. There’s nothing wrong with this per se, but something in their education and cultural experiences/preferences informs them that it’s so lame and a waste of a life to be a privileged materialistic yuppie who lives the Ugly American lifestyle. They long to be AUTHENTIC, and you can’t attain that brand by being a middle class middle of the road white yuppie!! The only way you can buy some Authenticity is by supporting some ‘radical’ cause, listening to Afro-pop and calling for more aid to Africa, going on travels to less developed places around the world where pristine cultures haven’t yet been spoiled by rich materialistic Western people–as opposed to ‘caring’, ‘sensitive’, ‘cool’, and ‘progressive’ Western people such as themselves.
Just as materialistic and compromised Christians attend church on Sunday and seek forgiveness for their sins and trespasses, modern liberals and leftists pray to Marx and Martin(the Noble Negro) for their compromises with the materialist ‘greed’.
Che Guevara is also very appealing to modern liberals and leftists because he, like Marx, supposedly went all the way and compromised nothing. If Marx was intellectually 100% committed and courageous, Che was physically 100% committed and courageous. He died in the jungles of Bolivia, and attained the status of new Jesus for the New Left. Of course, most actual liberals and leftist are more like Naomi Klein. They want their yuppie privilege, fancy condos, fine dining, expensive coffee, travels and tourism to exotic places, and etc. Though politically, culturally, and spiritually raised to be leftists, they are the beneficiaries of the ‘capitalist-imperialist’ system. So, they latch onto something that gives them meaning and assures them that they are indeed involved in the radical revolution, if only indirectly or in spirit. Some affluent ‘progressives’ find radical redemption by vacationing in Cuba, smoking Cuban cigars, going to rock concerts where the star-as-saint yammers between songs on saving the rain forest/feeding the hungry in Africa/impeaching George W. Bush.
Anyway, the point is that many leftists and liberals know what Obama is about and up to. They know all about his Alinsky past and his far left sympathies. They know that Obama is a subversive radical. But, this excites than disturbs them since they too grew up with the notion that being ‘radical’, ‘revolutionary’, ‘subversive’, and so forth is cool. Indeed, being straight and forthright are considered white, middle-class, and lame. Educated people who listen to NPR and watch PBS prefer slick and sly jazz to straight-forward country music or even sober & dignified classical music. Obama is a radical slickster and jive-master, but being a subversive, he also knows how to feign earnestness. He knows how to pull the Will Smith schtick in ‘Six Degrees of Separation’.
That’s what makes him subversive as opposed to people like Malcolm X who were radical and anti-mainstream but not subversive. Malcolm X was straight forward in everything he said, regardless of whether they happen to be true or false, sane or insane. In contrast, Obama always wears masks, and he must be understood in terms of an actor in a blockbuster movie financed and written by liberal Jews. He’s their Will Smith in politics.
Anyway, though ‘subversive’ has negative connotations for conservatives, it’s a badge of honor for leftists and even many liberals. It means being cutting-edge, daring, cool, exciting, rebellious, slick, tricky, witty, and brilliant. Just as con-men take pride in their ability to trick people, many ‘progressives’ take pride in fooling and hoodwinking the lame, banal, bland, and dull white middle class. ‘Progressive’ subversives also take moral pride since they believe their deviously naughty fun will bring about ‘social justice’. (It’s a matter of having the cake and eating it too. They get to have fun playing bad boys and girls rebelling against The System, but miraculously the end result of all this conceited and contrived game is supposed to be the Better Future. Of course, there has long been a connection between the super-rich and the radicals, not least because the super-rich are vain, narcissistic, and want to share in the fun of being ‘progressive’ and ‘revolutionary’ in the locomotive seat of history. So, it’s not surprising that many rich people have tried to appropriate the radical style, rhetoric, outlooks, and manners. In a way, the rise of Obama is the product of an understanding between the liberal super-rich business class and the super-privileged Ivy League radicals. Obama is like the most expensive political doll built or bought by the super-rich class who, having amassed tremendous fortunes in the past 30 yrs, want to play at being big government socialists by pulling the (purse)strings of their toy radical puppet. In this sense, Obama is to the rich liberal Jews what Will Smith is to Hollywood Jews.)
It’s surprising that many ‘progressives’ come from the white middle class, but it’s not hard to understand why that is. Having come from Middle America, they feel lame and inadequate(as middle class America is depicted that way by popular culture and higher education), and many seek meaning and excitement though radical politics, subcultures, or avant-garde intellectualism. Look on youtube and you find a whole bunch of bedroom philosophers and kitchen table revolutionaries speaking into the digicam to prove that they are not just another lame middle class person but a member of the avant garde or some cool secret society or movement. And so, when conservatives point out Obama’s Alinsky past, many ‘progressives’ think it’s so cool that Obama is a subversive, wink wink.
Of course, there is genuine awe and admiration for Obama on the part of many liberals and leftists, among both the duped and duplicitous. But, how can the duplicitous who know what Obama is really about look upon him as a ‘shining prince’? It’s because the human mind is infinitely complex and can fool itself in countless ways. Yes, it’s possible for even cynical and subversive duplicitous individuals to fall under the spell. Man is half intellect, half emotions.
‘Progressives’ have long sought a racial healer or a deliverer who embodies the positive qualities of Kennedy, King, FDR, Lincoln, Oprah, and Malcolm X. So came Obama, the master of many masks. (Even makers of masks can fall for their own masks, just like liars can come to believe in their own lies, and fabulists can fall for their own fantasies. It’s like the spider is forever the prisoner of the web it spins.) Also, no matter how subversive or cynical ‘progressives’ may be, their deepest core is enervated by a naive quasi-religious view of world salvation. Leftists may be tricky and sly on the outside, but their inside hugs-n-tugs an innocent child who wants the world to be perfect. So, strange as it may seem, not only the duped but even the duplicitous can get carried away by the Obama cult.
This was true of communist movements as well. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, many communist members were subversive, ruthless, hard-nosed, and pitiless. But, many of them did indeed believe in the shining myth of Stalin EVEN WHEN THEY KNEW that Stalin gained and maintained his power through the dirtiest and the most sinister of means. All people need something to stake their faith in, especially idealists. Therefore, even people who would later be crushed by Stalin died believing in the noble myth of the all-knowing Big Brother.
Similarly, on the one hand, many ‘progressives’ are deeply skeptical, sly, cynical, and cunning people. They are subversive. On the other, they are naive and quasi-religious idealists intoxicated with faith in a Better Future. They have this powerful need to attach onto some Great Theory or Great Personality. So, even those who know Obama for what he is are willing to project onto him their hopes and delusions. Even the duplicitous are capable of duping themselves. Obama, of course, knows this, how it works, and how to manipulate it. He knows that many of his followers are the duped while others are duplicitous. But, he also knows that even the duplicitous have a certain psychology that needs to cling to a Great Faith or Myth, and he knows how to play to those emotions. Even the smartest person responds to the world rationally only 50%. The other 50% is affected by sights, sounds, rhythm, texture, the groove and style, etc. This is why a man as smart as Einstein could fall for socialism or delude himself that Gandhi is a great saint.
Jesus said man doesn’t live on bread alone. It’s also true that man doesn’t live on ideas alone. The ideas he espouses must be attached, embodied, and expressed by a personality. Personality gives life to ideas. So, the "I Have a Dream" speech was just an idea from the pen of a Jewish writer. It came to life only with the delivery by Martin Luther King. King gave Life to those ideas, and in a way, became the very embodiment of or even bigger than those ideas. Today, his message of Love and Peace mean nothing to most blacks who listen to rap music and demand racial favoritism. But, the cult of King-the-personality is bigger than ever. Ideas become personified, and the person becomes mythified. In the end, the meaning of the ideas takes a backseat to the Myth of those ideas as embodied by The Great Personality. Same is true of what has become of Mao in China. Chinese no longer care for his communist ideas but still revere him as a symbol of Chinese unity, glory, pride, and power. Maoism isn’t no longer about actually following Mao’s ideas by the letter but celebrating the spirit of those ideas by adapting them into symbols of nationalist power and glory.
Similarly, blacks embrace Martin Luther King personality cult not because they believe in color-blindness or peace but because the cult guarantees them automatic moral superiority and racial pride. White ‘progressives’ cling to the King cult either out of opportunism, naive idealism, or radicalism. Scared conservative opportunists want to use the King cult to argue against racial favoritism(‘content of character’ over ‘color of skin’) and to persuade blacks to choose peace over violence. Liberals cling to the King cult in the hope that some kind of racial harmony may prevail. Radicals want to use the King cult as a Trojan Horse tactic to fool white people into dropping their guards against the rise of black and Jewish power.
Anyway, just as King imbued white liberal ideas of 60s with Music and Charisma, Obama aims to do the same today. Again, we see a similar set-up and pattern. Most of the writers are Jewish. Jews have great intellect and cunning but not much in the way of charisma. Blacks have that hormone charged intensity but aren’t much for ideas. We saw this in pop music too. Brill Building was largely made up of Jewish songwriters, but many of the singers were black. Jews supplied the songs, and blacks delivered the performances. Of course, Jews did this with whites too. Jewish Hollywood came up with screenplays but found big tall handsome goyim to bring the pages to life. Ayn Rand the Jewess wrote the novel and screenplay of "The Fountainhead" but big tall handsome Gary Cooper brought it to life. Milton Friedman was the funny looking yoda-like man of ideas behind Reaganomics, but Reagan was the man who gave it a face that inspired millions. Jews are brilliant, smart, and/or cunningl but tend to be gnome-like and funny looking. They need to partner up with the ‘Aryan’ or the ‘Negro’. In the past, Jews used ‘Aryans’ like Charlton Heston to popularize their artistic ideas and political values. Today, ‘Aryans’ have been vilified and dehumanized while Negroes have been elevated in their place. But, the people who are still financing this and writing the script are the Jews. Even in the conservative movement, the writers have often been people like David Frum, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, etc.
Many white liberals and leftists see themselves as people of brilliance, knowledge, intelligence, and ideals. But, they feel that they themselves lack either charisma or the moral right to preach to the world about a Better Future. After all, leftist history says white people are to blame for all the evils in the world. Of course, Jews are exempt from ‘white guilt’ but good many of them tend to look funny and have annoying public personas. Anyway, most white people feel that they don’t have the right to be moral leaders or exemplars because of the morally stained history of white people.
With white liberals, the problem is compounded by the fact that they’ve also burdened also themselves with American guilt, whereby Americans are supposed to apologize to the rest of world, especially to Europeans, for being too powerful, being too rich, and consuming too much.
Therefore, many ‘progressives’ have wanted a ‘person of color’–innocent of the sins of Western History–to lead the way, but most blacks turned out to be crazy and unfit for this role. Even Martin Luther King, observed closely, was a scumbag in private life. Liberals felt they had the message but not the proper messenger nor the ‘perfect storm’ through which their ideas could be embraced by most people. Of course, conservatives too had a similar problem for a long time before Reagan finally came along during the Perfect Storm of 1980.
Conservatives felt they had strong and solid ideas but suffered an image problem in the 60s-70s. There was the granite-faced not-very-likable Goldwater, the dark and shadowy Nixon, and the inept Ford. The great conservative moment came when Reagan arrived on the scene just when the Carter administration was in total free fall. The Great Communicator had the physical and charismatic instruments to deliver those ideas to the public at large. He had a way of making conservative theories sound simple and accessible, even inspirational. He persuaded people as to why America needs a strong military and how that could restore American pride and power.
Just as a bomb, no matter how well-conceived, is useless without a missile to deliver it to its target, an idea is useless unless there is a personality that can deliver it far and wide to the public. Otherwise, it remains a just another intellectual idea or policy proposal. Conservatives really had to wait until 1980 for a man like Reagan to arrive.
Democrats thought their star had arrived with Clinton, but Billy boy turned out to be too rascally and childish(and out of control). Clinton let everyone down. So, Obama is the New Hope. If Clinton was the first black white president(prone to reckless self-destruction), Obama is like the first white black president(disciplined in terms of what he needs to do). Therefore, many liberals are crazy about Obama for this reason for the Messiah of the Great Liberal Message has finally arrived.
Obama is the great missile that white liberals–especially the Jews–have been waiting for all these yrs to carry their message all the way to the Moon. He is the political equivalent of the Final Frontier. He’s the (Rock)Star Child of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
White liberals have had Grand Ideas they’d wanted to implement for a long time but all their missiles proved to be duds or faulty. Duds were Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry. The ambitious but ultimately flawed missile was Clinton. There was Hillary with the Great Healthcare Plan but she lacked the charisma and ‘character’ to deliver it on target to the American public. Many people just didn’t warm to her nor trust her. They saw her as overly shrewd, cold, arrogant, and calculating. (Obama is no different but he knows how to seem different, at least to all the dupes out there.)
But, liberals now have Obama, perfect in the age of Will Smith, Oprah, and Hip Hop(when most young white people are more into blackness than whiteness). He’s supposed to be the super missile that delivers all the Neo-New Deal ideas right on target. Liberals are further emboldened by the fact that 2008 has been a year of the Perfect Storm. 8 yrs of Bush made the white male unfashionable. Bush was a poor missile who never hit the target; his public persona was especially a disaster. His words seem to drip out of his mouth like saliva. The Iraq War as long, painful, and costly. The economic meltdown of 2008 played into liberal hands since the blame usually goes to the party in power. McCain had the wrong image–weak voice, old face, wobbly body, etc–in a nation that’s into hip hop culture and youth narcissism. Also, Obama as a missile could rely on support of the launching pad and airspace–liberal Jewish controlled media and academia.
Anyway, when white liberals and leftists see Obama, they don’t just see a fellow duplicitous subversive radical, but the deliverer that has finally arrived to take the liberal (Jewish) ideas to their intended targets. He is the giant mythical bird that has finally arrived to take liberal ideas to the promised land. He’s supposed to finally finish what FDR started, what Kennedy failed to achieve due to the assassination, what LBJ failed to accomplish due to Vietnam War, what King failed to reach due to assassination, what Robert J. Kennedy failed to bring forth due to assassination, what Humphrey failed to do thanks to 60s out-of-control radicalism, what Carter failed to do due to his incompetence and bad luck, what Clinton failed to do thanks to his self-destructiveness, what Gore failed to do thanks to GOP having ‘stolen’ the election. In the liberal Grand Narrative, history was stolen from them by tragedies, accidents, bad luck, recklessness, etc. Obama is supposed to embody the perfect balance between white and black, between religious and secular, between national and international, between elitism and egalitarianism, between intellectualism and populism, between confidence and humility, between hip and the hop. So the stupid liberals think in their Hollywood-induced fantasies, as though mankind can be redeemed by mindless social engineering and pop-political gimcracks.
No less funny was the delusions of the Bush administration and many gentile whites in this country. White gentiles still seem to think they control America when they do not. The rulers of this country are liberal and leftist Jews. Liberal and leftist Jews dominate Ideas, Education, Information, Knowledge, History, and what we see, hear, and read. NY, the financial and intellectual capital, is mostly Jewish. LA, the pop cultural capital, is mostly Jewish. Northwest Coast, the center of high-tech billionaires, is dominated by Jews. Pharmaceutical companies are dominated by Jews. Most Jews are liberal or leftist. Most of the powerful lawyers are Jewish.
Yet, people like Bush and McCain still act as though white gentiles have all the power and therefore must be generous, kind, and tolerant of other people WHEN IN FACT the real people in power are the liberal and left-wing Jews(and their brainwashed goy allies and puppets)whose determined goal is to destroy and bring down white power, white interests, white unity, white pride, and the white race.
There’s a weird relationship between gentile whites and Jews, especially in the GOP. Though Jews are the most powerful people in this country, the political charade between white gentiles and Jews requires that white gentiles pretend that they have the power(and therefore must be overly kind and generous to others) in exchange for Jewish financial and intellectual support.
We have pretty much the same situation in Hollywood where Jews have the money and power, but they put forth bigshot gentile stars who give the false impression that Hollywood is dominated by people like Tom Cruise or Angelina Jolie. As the public face of Hollywood, gentiles are supposed to act like they rule and control Hollywood(and therefore be exposed to endless scrutiny and accountability)whereas the truly powerful Jews remain behind the scenes and amass bigger fortunes and gain greater power without any scrutiny whatsoever. We can see this with guys like Charlie Rose too. Having Charlie Rose as interviewer gives the impression that WASPS still control the media, but he’s just a puppet of Jews who really control the media. Well, that’s just how it goes.
Posts
6947
ReplyDelete[Once again blogger demands I must break up this entry; here's first part. A.]
ReplyDelete* * * * *
Andrea Hits Stride, Does Brilliant Job Characterizing, Analyzing The "Left"
(Apollonian, 27 May 09)
Well, I think this one here, "The Duped...," is Andrea's most impressive essay yet--esp. for her gripping and ruthlessly accurate general psychologic characterization in her trademark breezy, flowing style; Andrea doesn't stint for the details, all of them so telling and effective for this essay of hers.
Yes, people in general are superficial for their understanding of things, I guess, and especially things cultural. And yes, people really are mostly followers who have difficulty thinking most confidently for themselves.
People need that leadership. Christianity of late, has failed horribly for that leadership--of course, that's because Jews have so brilliantly subverted it with their oceans of funding, having so perfectly bought and owned the "Judeo-Christians" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.), for example.
I'd say worst thing that happened for Christianity through the centuries is it lost its explicit anti-semitism--WHICH WE MUST URGENTLY REGAIN, esp. with a nuclear armed TERROR-state, Israel, unquestionably the greatest threat to humanity, a vicious attack-dog, straining at the leash and foaming-at-the-mouth to attack Iran, for example.
But there's one section (two paragraphs, I think) of this essay, near the end, 2nd to last, that I'd disagree with most pointedly, and that's the one beginning w. "No less funny...."
For the rulers of this country are un-questionably the CFR-Bilderberg Judeo-conspirators (see TheNewAmerican.com and AugustReview.com for expo/ref.) behind the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) COUNTERFEIT conspiracy (see RealityZone.com and TheMoneyMasters.com for expo/ref. on the Fed fraud), without the slightest doubt.
And yes, these Fed conspirators are mostly and heavily Jews who then work through their Jew co-racialists and surely allied gentile cohorts--who aren't only leftists or "liberals"--for one must not forget the "neo-cons." For I surely wouldn't characterize the CFR-type creatures as "liberal" as I would more outrightly fascist, let's face it--they indubitably want a statist, top-down -type government.
[---second part, see below--- A.]
[---Here's second part--- A.]
ReplyDelete* * * * *
And these Judeo-conspirators play a distinct game, "good-cop vs. bad-cop," depending on the pt. of view for their target audience. For the leftists, the "good-cop" is the United Nations (UN) communist (not really "liberal") world gov. And for the rightists, mainly the JC-types, the "good-cop" is fascist, blood-thirsty Israel.
Andrea captures the "leftist" mentality quite well, I suspect, but not so well the JCs who are actually more numerous, I submit, entailing millions, affecting then so many other Christian-oriented people.
And I agree w. Andrea for her statement regarding her last section's "weird relationship," esp. for the JCs. But that relation is simply, really epitomized by that idiotic delusion on part of so many JCs and others like-minded (hence "religious," who make up most people) that Christ was a Jew, Jews necessarily defined as Talmudists--or related thereto. For again, Christ was absolutely--and explicitly--anti-Talmud (Gosp. MARK 7:1-13).
So I'll conclude here again with my great and growing appreciation, esp. again for this, her latest essay, regarding Andrea's grip and grasp for her brilliant psychologic characterization--but only for the leftist component of the population/society.
For Andrea still has a little ways to go for similarly mastering the JC component of society who are so Christian-styled and -affected--and who actually make up a greater portion of the total society/population, I submit.
The cultural key then is the Jew COUNTERFEIT/criminal conspiracy and their sublime funding and manipulation of JCs and establishment Christianity--Andrea's excellent psychologic analysis and work makes me think about that evermore, Christian-oriented as I am.
Greatest problem then for Christianity is the gross MYSTICISM which has taken such hold over the centuries, again, which so much and so thoroughly deludes the people, so far, esp. for the necessary and essential ANTI-SEMITISM (anti-Talmud, again, and also don't forget JOHN 8:44) for Christianity, without such anti-semitism Christianity is so utterly meaningless and indeed, mis-guided, as we see.
CONCLUSION: Andrea does most excellent work, I say once again, for setting off this Christian mis-guidedness, contrasted then for the "leftists" who think and act so much as Andrea describes so well--I sincerely hope she keeps up her great work as she demonstrates in this latest essay. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
I gotta ask, as Christians,just exactly when did the rest of the "duped" world forget that those yellow jew bastards are the ones who crucified Jesus.. a good point made, when did the fire of christianity die, the prudence, the values, the drive to live a good life? instead we have homosexuality being taught in school as normal, prayer being stripped from everything but church, (where as the country was founded on the principles of the bible, and anyone who wishes to contest that, look at the artwork behind the supreme court judges bench and no fewer than 13 other places in the building including the doors)and god forbid questioning the Holohoax. When did this change? how and when did being a white christian male become a crime? when did we forget that we are the dominant race and religion on this planet? I for one havent.
ReplyDeleteNever Forget: Life Sucks--A Cyclic Historical Process
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 28 May 09)
"J," remember life sucks (Greek Tragedy), and history is a CYCLIC process, according to "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler. No matter how good humanity can make things, still it must degenerate as humans suffer that hubris and "original sin."
Thus Christianity was/is defense of TRUTH (hence objective reality, necessary criterion) against Jew lies and conspiracy, subjectivity always the basis of lies--this according to sublime Gosp. JOHN.
Thus remember Christianity is properly the greatest AESTHETIC monument to HUMAN REASON, science, logic, etc. But Christianity became MYSTIFIED, "faith" (originally meaning LOYALTY) becoming synonymous with such putrid, stinking mysticism.
Thus foremost Christian ethic of HONESTY was overthrown in favor of neo-Pelagianism ("good-evil") of J.J. Rousseau, Eng. Utilitarians, and especially Immanuel Kant--which then led to statism and socialism of Hegel, Marx, et al.
So present task is to "ride-out" this phase of "Decline of the West" in order to achieve another rise in the CYCLE of history. Thus we need refreshing, reviving, liberating JEW-EXPULSION--as of original Christian hero and saint, Constantine the Great.
But note present task is cut-out for us with nuclear-armed Israel and CFR-Bilderberg (see TheNewAmerican.com and AugustReview.com for expo/ref.) Judeo-conspirators who presently have so many people confused with their "good-cop, bad-cop" act.
CONCLUSION: Note then CYCLE of socio-biology (see KevinMacDonald.net) requires the Jew parasite disease-of-opportunity must begin to recede when it finally kills the host-victim, CFR-Bilderberg agents, Walt-Mearsheimer, pt-ing "finger" at "The Israel Lobby." "There is no honor among thieves." Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Sorry for the length but there is a point.
ReplyDeleteFor those of you wondering just who I am and what brings me to the boards here we go,Im J, literally my name is Jay, Im a New England Long line fisherman, so all of my knowledge, wit and wisdom tends to come from the sea. I never went to college,never saw the need to spend 4-8 more years in school and $25-60,000 to get a piece of paper stating i know something, when in all honesty, i probably already knew it. So it was the Corp for me. I spent many a year diggin' ditches and climbin' hills, but i enjoyed every second, and it was there i learned many a truth, including how race plays in todays society. The Corp as inclusive as it is, does show a true race diagram of the outside "civvy" world. Almost 3/4 of our platoon
was negro, and it was clear with the exception of one or two men, we white marines did all
the work and reaped few benefits. After my time served, I took all that money, (sarcasm as
Apollonian knows bout how much a Sgt makes) and through hard work and cash, bought my
fathers boat. He passed away 2 years later. I run my ship like a Captain should, fairly and
honestly, like i was raised to. About a 2 years ago, I took a jew on as crewman. first and
last time i will. I require all my crewmen to sign a contract with me, as is typical. In
that contract it states that I am the authority on board, and i answer only to God. I do, in
an act of leniency allow my crew to vote on important decisions, including food. This all
leads up to a lesson we should all heed. This jew who will be forever referred to as "Hebe"
decided not to partake in the organizing of a menu, something i suggest for all the crew so
it cuts down on complaints.
3 days at sea, Hebe knocks at my door,(it was his turn to cook),
and asks me if i have any kosher food on board. I reply as i always reply, "does it matter".
After a good 5 minutes of Hebe standing in silent rage, in my quarters, like a deaf mute who
just got slapped he procedes to lecture me on how its intollerant that i not have kosher food on board (refer back to my previous statement that i strongly urge my crew members to take part in menu planning, and he didnt). I for the most part ignore him untill he decides to take it the next step and get into my personal space (leaning over my desk),I, resisting the urge to throttle him, I ask what does he expect me to do, and he much to my chargrin says that i should turn around and make way back to port, and resupply. I could have defused
the situation by going back, yes, but as I stated , we were 3 days out, and had 20+ hours of
stringing lines under our belt and Im a stubborn man. I told him that at this point he could "eat, starve or what ever he wanted to do, just let me know so i can redistribute his share". Im fairly sure he wasnt used to someone who wouldnt grovel and give way to his
pathetic jewself. He leaves my office. i get a report in about 20 minutes later that he has started cutting lines loose. Thats my livelyhood he has now disrupted, I go to the deck toss him down (he had the cutters in his hand) tell him he is confined to his quarters, and im taking his share anyways. Anyways
we get back to shore, he takes off. days later as im prepping my next out, i am cornered on the pier by several police officers arresting me for "Hate Crimes".
Part 2
ReplyDeleteNot to bore you all with court details i plead not guilty. After some harsh testimony depicting me as this tyrant on the high seas, and a truely lackluster performance from my Jew lawyer I was sentenced to 90 days in jail and 2 years probation, for hate crimes, anti semitism and false imprisonment, my counter claims of destruction of property (my
lines hooks and lost fish) and disruption of livelyhood were dismissed, Im just now off of
my probation, and returning to the sea, So yes, ive been bitten, and have developed an actual anti-semitism, that was ironically brought on by the actions of a jew. Im sorry this story was off topic, and lengthy, but it was written so everyone here can uderstand just where im coming from and why. Thank you..
So the moral of this story is... if the holohoax was as bad as they say, perhaps thats because it was a good idea. "J"
We Need Jew-Expulsion--Bad
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 28 May 09)
That's incredible J--but I believe it--it's precisely true-to-life. It would seem kike was trying to get his behind tossed overboard--seems to me.
But didn't u have witnesses to the kike cutting ur lines?
Anyway, pt. is, if true, that's brilliant story, and all u need is to make a good outline-skeleton, and then go over it fm time to time, making notes and comments, and adding additional info and details. Don't forget the more u keep zealously to a specific theme or thesis, the better the story u have.
An immediate idea for theme which occurs to me is incredible gall of these hook-nose creatures--and how they're now just daring us to deal w. them. Seems a Marine would have good and definite ideas as to what to do--if he got motivated enough. And I'll bet kike had typical hook-nose too. Can u give any other details for how kike acted in other ways?--what he might have said?
In one way, one might say u were rather abrupt for telling Jew "eat, starve, or whatever"--but then again, it's also amazing (to average gentile, I'm sure) Jew would not do anything, wait three days, then demand to go back after u're out like u were and had all that activity already invested.
Yeah J, crap like that would surely make anyone prejudiced, unquestionably. In my case, in school, there are all kinds of Jew teachers everywhere, esp. in Arts and Sciences (this was state school, too, UNM, in Albuquerque NM), there were fewer Jews, proportionately for students.
At NMSU, where I went to grad school, I swear, out of about 20 teachers for hist. dept., at least 7 or 8 (and u know, maybe more I didn't know about) were Jews--no less than at least a third.
So there u have it J; our culture is absolutely infested and corrupted with these thoroughly perverted Jew filth. I'm actually surprised we're still holding out here in USA. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
I did have witnesses to the cutting of my lines, the 2 men, one of which was the gent that informed me of "hebe" cutting the lines, were given the opportunity to testify on my behalf about the lines but, the court deemed that the one line he was able to cut wasnt "sufficient" to level charges of destruction of property. He was indignant as hell when i wouldn't turn around and return to port, yelling swearing , calling me a racist S.O.B, and a Nazi which i'm not, but I can see their point. I am a simple man Apollonian, and a Marine I dont say alot nor do i need to, and on MY boat i dont deal with challenges to my authority well. The best i can figure is the stuff he could eat, was consumed within the first day or two, and he, having volunteered no input on the menu had no way of knowing what else was brought or not, His mistake and his loss. I was abrupt in my response because the crew is given 3-4 days to work out a menu for themselves, amongst themselves, if it is a problem for them later on thats not my concern, they should have planned better. I'm their captain, not a babysitter.
ReplyDeleteDetails Are Most Telling For Predatory Prosecution Of Un-Aware Gentiles
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 29 May 09)
J, I was wondering--what exact kind of "evidence" did hebe bring for convicting u of "hate crimes" and "anti-semitism"? What exactly was it u supposedly did that was legally "hate-ful"?
If u could explain or describe how these "laws" were construed, it would be enlightening, I'm sure. I mean, it sounds like hebe initiated all the stupid balderdash fm the beginning, u taken essentially entirely un-aware--u were rather "blind-sided," fm the sound of it all. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
The hate crime Issue , which i thought was heinous to begin with was brought about by the combination of the fact that A). he was the ONLY minority on my boat B). I was "Intollerant" of his situation concerning the meals and C). when i got out onto the deck, and i saw him with the cutters in his had (may i remind you these are bolt style cutters) I knocked him down, and to clarify that I came up clear in his line of vision, i didnt blindside him, and threw him a right cross that would have KO'd Joe Louis, So with the minority+me not caring if he ate+ the minor assault+ my really innept lawyer= I get slapped with a hate crime, The specific charge was false imprisonment (i confined him to quarters) and "Racially" motivated assault, which was a petty assault (misdemeanor) but because it was "racially or religiously motivated" it got bumped to a felony. And yeah I honestly didnt think someone would be as pathetic as he was to actually bring this to court, If he had been a MAN he would have come back to me and talked it out, But then again, when are kikes man about anything?
ReplyDeleteJews Must Know This Isn't Going To Be End Of It--They Must Be Plotting Chaos And General Mayhem
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 29 May 09)
So therefore, simply fact he was Jew was full criterion for the "hate" enhancement?--this is amazing, total mis-carriage. Of course, u're so disgusted, u're not about to spend/waste money for appeal, right? Looks like judicial "lynching"--"hit-job."
Paybacks for these Jews are going to be like French Rev., I'd say--esp. when and as people understand Jew machinations of such as USS Liberty incident (see UssLiberty.org).
CONCLUSION: Jews are surely cooperating and colluding w. Israeli MOSSAD even as we speak to initiate chaos--even if they can't fully control things, surely. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
This was almost over 2 years ago, unfortunately my 90 day apeal process is long since over, however I dont think any self serving judge would rule against a jew anyhow. But yes they have theirs coming fast..
ReplyDeletePredatory, Vindictive Jew Was Initiator Against Hapless, Victimized Gentile
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 29 May 09)
Okay, well J, I urge u to collect notes for this little episode, as I earlier expressed.
U must realize it's an amazing story, provided u're giving us all the main and pertinent details. I understand u have to be economic for ur presentation.
But for the life of me, I cannot see the basis for "hate" enhancement. It looks like merely because disgusting, demanding, destructive creature was Jew, was the criterion--again, given ur details.
Pls note earlier, I meant to say IT WAS U who was "blind-sided" by all these developments initiated entirely by the Jew--u were mere "target"-recipient who simply reacted best u could.
For one can easily understand all ur re-actions. U cannot be blamed for not providing for "Kosher" food--that's incredible. Ur reactions to Jew demands are thoroughly understandable. Knocking down someone with weapon in his hands, who's just done damage is perfectly understandable, as is confinement to quarters--which I'm sure is even understood as fairly routine policy under circumstances. So ur Jew-episode is still mind-boggling for me. Take care. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Ive been reviewing it ever since you made the suggestion, and i may post it finished copy one day, but for now im working on it lol. Yesterday was a fine day, in that we put the ole' broad back in the water, I can feel the life returning to me already. Oh on a different topic did anyone watch the lakers game last night and watch that stupid nigger tyrese gibson change the National Anthem?
ReplyDeleteVery good analysis of the Obama phenomena, a bit too long, though. I did stop and ponder about what you wrote about authentic living...
ReplyDelete"They long to be AUTHENTIC, and you can’t attain that brand by being a middle class middle of the road white yuppie!!"
IMO, there is absolutely nothing more authentic than raising White children, and defending them from an increasingly hostile world. Rather than attack the Prez for his Marxist leanings and Alinsky tactics, we should start looking for a defensible piece of land, upon which, we can circle our wagons, as our forebears did, hundreds of years ago, when threatened with extinction by the savages.
I agree Walter that raising white children to be leaders in a white world is unique, as is defending them against corruption, But as a Marine, I have to vehemelently oppose the rest of your post. We don't need to "find a piece of land", It IS our land , All of it. My drill instructor told us once, "Defense is dooming yourself to eventual failure, it is reacting to an opponents actions rather than neutralizing the threat" God bless him, and he was right.
ReplyDeleteBacking away, defending our last bastions is what white folks like us have been doing for a
long time, and in like any siege, we are defending, while the hordes of "savages" (jews, negros, hispanics, and politicians, commies and the ilk), like any good siege army are chipping away at our defenses, taking our rights, labeling us hate mongers, restricting our free speech, so that our opinions and outlooks are "hate crimes", taking our guns and with them our right to defend ourselves, labeling our religion as hate filled, Overloading our
justice system with their own so any justice we seek is tainted, you my friend can go on the
defensive, and stay there, circle your wagons, and after time there wont be anyone left in your wagons to fight back, attrition will its toll eventually, I on the other hand am going to war, to bring the fight to the enemy, and burn his fortifications down around him, If I become a casualty, Ok at least i became one knowinng i fought the good fight, Patrick Henry said it best.... It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in
the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, GIVE ME
LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!!!!!
We Need Christian Revolution, Serious Anti-Semitism, Founded Upon States-Rights
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 31 May 09)
"J," I agree w. ur spirit--but we can, I submit, do even better.
(a) First, we analyze the problem to get absolutely accurate picture for what's wrong--this ain't rocket science. Truth is simple: we're simply being manipulated and despoiled by a bunch of clever criminals--COUNTERFEITERS, as I say and note my above entries, this blog, for same references.
This is no kidding--when u have MONOPOLY on such COUNTERFEITING, u have incredible advantages, never doubt. Jews and their cohorts among gentiles just simply make up a distinct and formidable CRIMINAL family, Jews even making a RELIGION out of their criminality (see RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo).
(b) And what then will our revolution resemble?--I say it will be most like original CHRISTIAN rev. of St. Constantine the Great, whites the natural leaders. And that's great part of the "trick"--to keeping things focused against the MAIN ENEMY, the counterfeiters and their accomplices.
(c) And I agree we whites don't have to "retreat" at all--we should simply continue w. present state's rights movement, states asserting their prerogatives of 10th amendment as we've seen recently, state of Montana even NULLIFYING the Fed gov.'s gun-control laws--these are most propitious moves.
(d) Note then, Christians have to take philosophy SERIOUSLY, as in Gosp. JOHN, it's TRUTH vs. Jew lies and conspiracy, this then translating/converting to objective reality (criterion for truth) vs. subjectivism--ESPECIALLY as it regards morality/ethics, Christian HONESTY regaining primacy above subjectivist "good-evil" Pelagian heresy, esp. then, anti-racism and guilt.
(e) Greatest weak point for Judeo-conspirators are the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) hereticalists, foremost enablers of Israel terror-state, who are taught Christ was Jew (Talmudist). On contrary, Christ was foremost anti-semite (anti-Talmud, as Gosp. MARK 7:1-13).
Did u hear about the abortionist doctor who was shot at his (Lutheran) church today in Wichita, Kansas?--it was on WND.com.
So when we analyze it down, it isn't difficult to see and spot the various strengths and weaknesses. Christian volk just need greater consolidation. Christians need to realize CHRISTIANITY IS ANTI-SEMITISM, and if u ain't anti-semitic, u ain't no Christian, pilgrim--it really is simple as that--and it's quite do-able too. JCs just need "evangelization" and "re-education."
CONCLUSION: Of course, things economic and political have to get worse in order for people to get "motivated"--don't worry it's coming. US Dollar is cinch for collapsing, and soon; Russia has already dumped Dollar as reserve currency--and we're in for huge, heavy inflation--ck out PeterSchiffChannel.blogspot.com. Schiff is magnificent expositor, famous for his analogies. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
I agree Apollonian, it needs to be a focused effort, and im sorry for the delay, I had to take the "Ol'Broad" out for her first voyage in 2 years, and work her over hard, and ill be spending the next few days making general maintainance repairs, so if it take me a while to respond, thats why. Yes we need a focused effort on the part of christians, true Christians, to free our bretheren from the brainwashed Shit storm that is Judeo-Christianity. Jews have yet to realize that, the more they brainwash, and demoralize, and prod the everyday person, the more they bring about their own downfall. Its a perpetual victim cycle, They screwed with the world and its systems, brainwashing the people, and pushing for their own pipe dream of superiority (sounds familiar, but im talking about 1935)until *gasp* a charismatic brilliant man arises, wipes the veils of deciet away and people exact their vengance. after having not learned their lessons the jews are at it again, full of manipulations and dreams, But another will rise, Someone with enough clout that the good people of this world will follow, And then just like before, there will be tears....
ReplyDeleteTom Metzger, Given Fair Chance, Shines In Informative Interview
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 2 Jun 09)
Hey J, good to hear fm u--ck out WhiteReference.blogspot.com for incredible good blog (posted today) w. video interview of Tom Metzger--what a hero and actually, an outstanding strategist/analyst for things. It's fairly lengthy, in-depth production, almost 20 minutes; u'll be impressed for sure. Take care. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
The interview was about as informative as ive ever gotten, certainly not a wasted 205 minutes, Oh and on other notes, I went to go renew my firearms license and did you know I cant because of 90 days spent in jail this is Dog Shit in the first degree
ReplyDeletePeople Must Unite On Basis Of Real, Anti-Semitic Christianity And Reason
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 3 Jun 09)
J, it's TREASON, the attempt to dis-arm the citizens, but the poor victims of ZOG-Mammon who've allowed their souls to be bought don't quite know it yet, I'm afraid.
The way to get people together is by means of the real Christianity which is consistent w. reason and absolutely ANTI-SEMITIC (anti-Talmud, as Gosp. MARK 7:1-13). Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
They wonder why they are so hated.. Oh we are the victims boohoo, is all we hear from the jews, but (as I try not to whine)What about me, A hard working veteran, working to support my states economy with the fish i bring in and trying to support myself on the same catch, has now, A.) fallen into considerable debt,(2 years no fishing, ive done other jobs but it ain't enough) Has a criminal record, can no longer LEGALLY own my own firearms, and has been branded a known anti-semetic, in a town with a sizable population of jews. All over a trumped up bullshit charge. And they are the victims
ReplyDeleteOld USA Now US Of ENRON
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 4 Jun 09)
Yes J, excellent observations and analysis. And consider these notes of urs then are back-ground and fore-ground for ur story which u've lately begun to detail and sketch.
Don't doubt all honest people, of all races, know what the real story is with those monsters called "Jews." Only question now is what exactly to do.
And I keep emphasizing for folks (a) WEAK-POINT for entire Judeo-conspiracy are the JCs--most of whom are really dupes and suckers, not outright traitors--like the leadership, these heavily infiltrated with queers, as we've come to understand.
(b) And the more we emphasize the simple little racket that gives Jews allllllllllllllll their practical power--COUNTERFEITING (which remember, even a child understands)--the more we'll be able to win over the people, simply by primary means of simplest truth and info. For Christ was NOT "Jew"--they murdered him. Christ was foremost anti-semite (anti-Talmud), etc.
(c) And as prices inevitably begin the upward inflationary spiral--very soon now--people will remember what we've emphasized and taught; it's not really "rocket-science," as I say.
Note further, comrade J, evermore it becomes apparent we live in the United States of ENRON, US now treated like the old, now defunct corporation which was systematically looted by Jews and accomplices at the top, Obama really just the front-man/flunky mouth-piece who reads everything scripted for him fm tele-prompters.
CONCLUSION: The people of USA just have to react to the alert we're systematically making--especially given the previous instances of poor stock-holders who were left holding the bag for ENRON. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Patrick Henry, one of this country's greatest Americans hit it right on the head 200+ years ago
ReplyDeleteBad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.
and more importantly,
It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ! For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.
A great essay, the fools who voted for the "Magical Negro" are sad and sickening lot. Part of the problem almost no one is willing to talk about or fight "cultural marxism." Obama is a red-diaper grand baby, the personification of the degenerate 1960's zeitgeist and he is now the president of these United States...
ReplyDelete[I note "Faust," above, features Andrea's essay, "The Duped...," at his blog, with some notes of his own, in reply to which, and where I posted below-copied. A.]
ReplyDelete* * * * *
"Obama Phenomenon": Matter Of Historic CYCLE, Hubris
(Apollonian, 6 Jun 09)
Hello "Faust" (see PilgrimageToMonsalvat.blogspot.com, "The Duped...," 6 Jun 09)--I've seen ur entries on several blogs. I agree w. u Andrea (Freiboden.blogspot.com) is neat new writer/advocate/critic for our side--US patriots and Christians. I only wish Andrea would separate her paragraphs with a line space--rather than merely separating the sections.
But I note u mention the "essence of the Obama phenomenon." So wouldn't u say Obama is mere frontman/spokes-flack for the US of ENRON? For that's what's happening to former USA, isn't it?--LIQUIDATION--Old USA is now being looted and stripped bare, just like the old ENRON corporate entity, now defunct, the native people of USA letting themselves be sold into (debt) slavery.
Of course, Bush was same thing as Obama now, but the simile to (late) Ken Lay, the former ENRON CEO, didn't work as well for Bush as it does now w. Obama, the trained monkey who reads so well fm the tele-prompter.
Otherwise, "Obama phenomenon" consists practically entirely of a media image propelled by "electronic voting" and fraud (see BlackBoxVoting.com and BlackBoxVoting.org for expo/ref.), Obama, the "magic negro" for the CFR-Bilderberg conspiracy--see TheNewAmerican.com and AugustReview.com for expo/ref.
Thus people of USA suffer hubris within the CYCLIC historic process, having become successful, prosperous--thus smug and hubristic--imagining they're like God with perfectly "free" will capable of achieving "good" (hence Pelagian heresy).
Thus now the Jew parasite disease-of-opportunity rages, feeding upon the duped suckers and corrupt, effeminate, weakling descendents of the old American founding heroes and real Christians who originated USA and made it great.
So now we're left, I submit, to waiting till this Jew parasite disease burns itself out, having exhausted the store of excess goyim population fm and upon which to feed, Jew parasite disease now forced to turn against itself--as we see CFR-Bilderberg agents, Walt-Mearsheimer, pt. "finger" at "The Israel Lobby." "There is no honor among thieves."
But we still, I contend, must successfully dispose of the Jews' most valuable collaborators among gentiles, the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) hereticalists who are legion, foremost ENABLERS of Jew disease, JCs imagining Christ was Jew (hence Talmudist).
CONCLUSION: Thus the poor duped and mis-guided people, JCs and others, must be enlightened by means of Christian HONESTY, consistent with ideal of TRUTH (vs. Jew lies), according to Gosp. JOHN, objectivity (necessary criterion), and simple CONCRETES--as distinct fm hard-to-understand abstracts (like "capitalism" and "inflation," for examples)--to effect US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) is mere COUNTERFEITING fraud/scam/operation--see RealityZone.com and TheMoneyMasters.com for expo/ref. For even children then can understand such counterfeiting concrete. Such then, in general and briefly, is my assessment of "Obama phenomenon." Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
apollonian: "On contrary, Christ was foremost anti-semite (anti-Talmud, as Gosp. MARK 7:1-13)."
ReplyDeleteI fully agree that Jesus was a major anti-Semite - he was certainly one of the strongest opponents of Jews/Judaism of all time...however, he couldn't have been anti-Talmud as you put it because the Talmud had not been written, much less codified, during Jesus' life.
True, but Christ still can be considered anti-talmud by the fact that the ideas and principles that eventually went into the talmud he opposed.
ReplyDeleteGreat essay (but long!). Better comments. "J" gets right to the heart of "The Problem". I wish I could say that was unusual. Think about it. They constitute 3% of the US population. Point-four percent worldwide. Why do we spend so much time on them?
ReplyDeleteIn fact, there wouldn't BE a "them" if it weren't for behavior like "J" describes. Oddly, I think this ties rather nicely to the subject essay. All this talk of "left" and "right" or "radical" vs. "conservative" misses the point. Those are "constructs". History DOES repeat. That story is of people trying to live together and find meaning. The thing the essay misses is that you will never find meaning in politics. Why would someone look to the scum of the earth, namely politicians, to find meaning? Why are they surprised when "their" bought-and-sold public serpent shows it's true colors? How could anybody find this surprising?
I wouldn't dishonor Christ by mentioning Him in a sentence with Karl Marx or a politician. If morons want to make a religion of politics they deserve what they get.
People need faith to form personal ethics. If they don't do that they have nothing to demand from whatever government they are struggling with. Any fool who looks to Obushma or one of the other members of the Kosher-Nostra for "meaning" is a sad specimen to begin with.
"J's" "Hebe" is precisely what you get without personal morality. You don't get that from politics, of any stripe.
History does repeat. it is the endless cycle of parasites trying to live off the labor of others. It doesn't matter what label you choose for them. They are all self-serving opportunists. "Liberal" and "consevative" is what you get from those who seek to control the discussion. They want to define the "acceptable" terms of discussion. They want you to believe those are your only options.
No, "J" acted honorably. The judge displayed his personal "honor". That's why we can't care about those in "authority" determining "right" and "wrong". It's a joke. All I can say is I salute "J". If I'd have been there I'd be in prison. He'd have been overboard.
Talmudic Beginnings Pre-Date Even Christ
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 7 Jun 09)
"Eman," on the contrary, the writings of the Pharisees, even at time of Christ, known loosely as the "Traditions of the Elders," are proto-Talmudic, the beginnings of what later became known as the Talmud. What is the Talmud, anyway?
Talmud is simply rabinnic commentary upon the Torah, the "spoken law," consisting of Mishnah and Gemarrah, the Gemarrah the commentary upon the Mishnah commentary. These are the "commandments of men" purported to be of God by Pharisees and rabbis.
So my characterization is perfectly accurate--all u're talking about is the most elaborated, finished version--which were originally begun even before the time of Christ.
Best exposition on Talmud is at RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
I will have to leave this in two comments due to the character restrictions.
ReplyDeleteYou have interesting points but they are so steeped in a racist mindset that I cannot even get through reading them.
Corruption isn't racist - it corrupts the (so-called) black and the white, the Jew and the gentile, the intellect and the fool alike. Your comments such as "Whites were assured that some nice Negroes would come and play, and that would be that. Well, look at the NBA and NFL today!", and "[Obama]smiles a lot and acts partly like a nice and polite ‘House Negro’. But, it’s all just an act." are indicative of an attitude condoning that one group of people, in this case defined by their genetic inheritance (black), should be subservient to another group of people, to be the "House Negro" as long as it's authentic and not a play to shift the power structure.
In other words: they are the shadow of a superiority complex.
(BTW Obama smiles a lot and acts nice not as a good "House Negro" but as a good politician! For the most part the ones on top are masters of duplicity and gaining the trust of the public and will resort to all tricks in the book, including pinched smiles and cliched "hand-shaking and baby-kissing". In terms of smiling he's not doing anything that Bush wouldn't do. So is Bush a (white) "House Cracker"?)
You may be smarter than the majority of the population and can give your ego a pat on the back if that makes you feel better. But you are not immune to possessing the traits of evil apparent in those who think they are superior, elite, above, and entitled to look down their nose at others.
You berate Jews for being the controlling power but are you just jealous that you were left out? It sounds like you'd be quite happy with a hierarchy ruled by gentiles with blacks and Jews underfoot. It's the same sick paradigm of pyramidal power, same eye, just a different face at the top.
You proliferate one of the lies of the "Jews" by calling them Jews. They are not; this fact is documented in their own encyclopedia & almanac. They are descended from Khazars, who appropriated the Jewish faith but are not descendants of Judah.
Some argue that there exists evidence to identify the Afro-Americans and their predecessors as the true descendants of Judah. The ancient Egyptians were also black based on suppressed archaeological evidence. Why this need to cover the rich cultural, religious, scientific background of blacks? Why the need to convince the public that blacks are mainly just good at sex, entertainment, and taking over the NBA?
I agree that the majority of Americans drank the Obama "Koolaid". But oddly you suggest his agenda is to use his position to redirect the balance of power and re-distribute wealth to blacks worldwide. If this were to happen, it would only be a distracting plot in a deeper NWO ploy. You make no mention of the fact that by virtue of his white mother, he is related to most of the presidents of the US including Bush, and that these 2 are related to the British Royal Family - descended from the prophet Muhammad.
It doesn't matter how many empires rise and fall, be they Ming, Ottoman, Egyptian, Roman, British, whatever, this bloodline will endeavor to put themselves at the top of the one that currently holds the power. This is not about nationalism, it's about nepotism. It's not about Jews against gentiles, or whites against blacks - it's about a bloodline, a family within a nation and not the nation itself.
This is part two of my comment:
ReplyDeleteThis family practices an occult obsession with bloodline genetics. Their goal is to preserve their family line while causing everyone else to divide, war, spill blood and kill. They manipulate culture, world events, media, and more to brainwash the people and control them. In this way they can influence and perpetrate the adoption of belief systems based on false grounds of superiority - racism, nationalism, etc. to encourage conflict between men. In this way there are plenty of blood sacrifices to their occult gods.
To address the comment from J., if he believes that the "actions of a Jew" has caused him to become antisemetic, he is just as fooled as the "Jew" who has been sensitized by his culture, his parents, siblings, family and friends, community, school, radio, television and film to frame any conflict that develops with a non-Jew (lol) as 'antisemetic', and to go so far as to even provoke them, to prove his own fears and insecurities right. These people are literally programmed to be terrified of being victimized as their ancestors were in the holocaust, what you perceive as a "power-trip" is their security blanket, a huge compensation for their insecurity.
You can continue to frame up the modus operandi of elite powers as "Jews taking control", or you can let go of the lie you love to hate. As long as you play into the checkerboard attitude of "us-against-them" you and the "Jew" are one and the same.
Where I don't believe in the whole bloodline bit, it is plausible but i've never seen any sufficient proof, i really can only argue with one point here, I'm not smarter than anyone else of ANY race, as matter of fact i think im on the low end of the scale, BUT I do have common sense and a sense of justice. Both of those were violated by a jew, So I take an anti-semetic approach until I find someone or something that redeems them in my eyes. Yes I am prone to evil, hate and ego. We all are and no matter what ANYONE says we all have our prejudices, I just have the balls to voice them without shame. I don't have anything personally against black people or any other people as a race. I do however have things against individuals. BUT where negros are negros by race, jews are jews by RELIGION, A jew can quit being a jew. And its the power mongering, self pitying, money hungry victim attitude of the Religion I have the issue with. Just like I have issues with most weekend warrior Christians. BTW Just how are all the presidents related, Please, map that one out for me. If you want to send links I can give you my email.
ReplyDelete"True Nature": Babbling Fool, Just Talks Lies
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 8 Jun 09)
Oh yeah, right, "True Nature," dumbass know-it-all, u're so holy and wise, but if u really knew anything as u pretend u'd know the holohoax is all Jew lies--see Codoh.com, Ihr.org, and ZundelSite.org for expo/ref.
And if u really knew anything about Jews, as u pretend u do, u'd know Talmud is their basic, guiding document and program (see RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo) wherein they make themselves co-equal with God, God their slave who cannot resist loving them sooooooooooo.
CONCLUSION: "True Nature," take ur idiot's advice and stick it. I adhere to Gosp. JOHN theme, Christian TRUTH vs. Jew lies and conspiracy, comrade--that's what's going on, ur stupid Jew-friendly balderdash and excuses notwithstanding. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
you people should be ashamed of yourselves.
ReplyDeleteAnd YOU should have the BALLS to leave a name you pathetic excuse for a human, instead of coming on to a site and showing us just how useless of an American you are, you should be making a point and maybe starting and having a decent discussion. But instead, you , like all of your no good yuppie office working COWARDS, throw out a one lined spout off and use the annonymity of the internet to retreat into your little corner of the universe. Why should I be Ashamed? I served my country, I work hard for a living, and BY GOD I am entitled to what ever opinion I so chose. So stick your thumb back in your ass and your pacifier in your mouth, or for you you little ass-clown it may be the other way round, and go back to fondling yourself to pictures of Obama-bin-Laden and leave actual Americans to their own buisness.
ReplyDeleteSemper Fi mother fucker.